This submission does NOT constitute consent on the part of the submitter to: 1. A “self-assessment”; 2. Any kind of assessment on the part of the IRS under the authority of 26 USC § § 6014, 6020(b), or 6201; 3. Become a “taxpayer” (26 USC § 7701(a)(14); 4. Become a statutory “resident” (26 USC § 7701(b)(1)(A)) or a statutory “citizen” (8 USC § 1401) domiciled on or physically present on federal territory in the “United States” (26 USC § 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10)) or subject to federal civil law; 5. An election by a “nonresident alien” to become a “resident alien” pursuant to 26 USC
8 Enter year in space provided and check one or more boxes. For the tax year ending December 31, _________
The information returns you received for the above year from the source identified in item 5 and 6 above were false and fraudulent because (check all that apply):
|
Check |
Action |
|
Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
The company submitting the information return unlawfully did one or |
My status must be accepted as I declare it under penalty of perjury. Otherwise, the company is |
more of the following: 1. Refused to accept my CORRECT |
engaging in witness tampering, practicing law without a license on my behalf without my consent, |
|
|
withholding paperwork; 2. Forced me to submit withholding |
compelling me to contract with the government to participate in the “trade or business” franchise, |
|
|
documents I now know to be false and fraudulent in its place.;3. |
and compelling me to associate in violation of the First Amendment. |
This is being done under |
|
|
Forced me to fill out the withholding form in a way that I know is |
the “color |
of law” as |
a quasi-government |
officer called a “withholding agent” (26 USC |
|
|
false or fraudulent. See the next section. |
|
§ 7701(a)(16)) and therefore are liable for a |
constitutional tort. |
See: |
Your Exclusive Right to |
|
|
|
|
Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, Form #13.008: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm. |
b |
|
It constitutes perjury under penalty of perjury to file Form 1099 |
The only thing the government can lawfully regulate is “public conduct” of “public officers” within |
information return against me or the private entity I represent. |
My |
the government. |
The Supreme Court has held that the ability to regulate private conduct is |
|
|
private, non-federal associates are NOT an “employer” under 26 USC |
“repugnant to the constitution”. Everything I do as a PRIVATE person is PRIVATE conduct. By |
|
|
§3401(d), or a government instrumentalities, officers, or agents in the |
“assuming” that I am a “public officer” or enforcing the duties of the office upon me without |
|
|
context of this private relationship. It is unlawful and a criminal |
compensation that I, and not you, deem satisfactory, you are forcing involuntary servitude upon |
|
|
offense for them to act as a public office of the government in violation |
me. The rules of statutory construction forbid adding anything to the definitions in the I.R.C. and |
|
|
of 4 U.S.C. §72 and 18 U.S.C. §912 outside the District of Columbia |
doing so constitutes a statutory presumption that is a violation of due process of law and a tort. |
|
|
(“United States”). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
The government identifying number on the form is not mine and |
The reasons I am not eligible to apply for, receive, or use a Taxpayer Identification Number are |
therefore not correct. It is incorrect because my work associate |
identified in: Why It is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a Taxpayer Identification Number, Form |
|
|
compelled me to sign and submit a knowingly false and fraudulent W- |
#04.205; http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm. |
Rebut with evidence signed under penalty of |
|
|
7, W-9, SS-4, or SS-5 form and/or to use a government identifying |
perjury within 30 days or be found in default and estoppel. |
|
|
|
|
|
number that does not belong to me by threatening to either not hire or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to fire me if I did not sign it and provide a number I am not eligible for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and cannot lawfully use. Anything done under the influence of duress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
becomes the act of the duressor and not my act and is voidable and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this report constitutes a DEMAND to void it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
Earnings of nonresident aliens domiciled outside of and working |
The following authorities expressly exempt the earnings of “nonresident aliens” domiciled and |
outside the “United States” (26 USC § 7701(a)(9) and (a)(10)) in |
working outside the “United States” from “wages”, “income”, or “gross income”. Statutes: |
26 USC |
|
|
other than a “trade or business”/“public office” within the U.S. |
§ 7701(a)(31), 26 USC |
§861(a)(3)(C)(i), 26 |
USC §1402(b), 26 |
USC §3401(a)(6), |
26 USC |
|
|
government are not includible in “gross income” and a “foreign |
§3406(g). Regulations: 26 CFR §1.872-2(f), 26 CFR §1.871-7(a)(4). 26 CFR §31.3401(a)(6)-1, and |
|
|
estate” pursuant to 26 USC § 7701(a)(31). They are “not subject” to |
26 CFR §31.3406(g)-1(e). Pursuant to 26 USC §6041(a), I cannot lawfully earn reportable “income” |
|
|
income tax, but at the same time not statutorily “exempt” nor am I |
as defined in 26 USC §643(b) because I am not the public “trust” or “estate” described therein. IRM |
|
|
an “exempt individual”. |
|
5.1.11.6.8, 26 USC §§6020(b) and 6201 forbids the IRS to do an assessment or SFR on me, and |
|
|
|
|
even if they do, it’s still only a proposal that requires my CONSENT, which I DO NOT give and never |
|
|
|
|
have given. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius |
|
|
|
|
e |
|
I have no delegated authority to act on behalf of or contractually |
The rights of those domiciled in states of the Union and protected by the Constitution such as |
obligate myself and/or the private entity I am representing to any |
myself and/or the entity I represent are “unalienable”, which legally means that they cannot |
|
|
obligation, franchise, or “benefit” offered by any government. |
The |
lawfully be sold, bargained away, or transferred through any commercial process, INCLUDING |
|
|
authority to contract with any government is expressly forbidden in |
franchises. |
Only |
those |
domiciled on federal |
territory may therefore |
lawfully enter into such |
|
|
the entity formation documents and/or fundamental law and |
contracts and I am not domiciled on federal territory but rather am present within a state of the |
|
|
therefore all contracts or franchises arising out of my consent are |
Union and protected by the Constitution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ab initio. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|