The Pro 6 Evaluation Team Report (ETR) serves as a crucial document in determining the special education and related services eligibility for children within the educational system. Crafted to offer a comprehensive overview of a child's abilities, needs, and the evaluation process, it includes critical sections covering everything from individual evaluator assessments to eligibility determination. Detailed within the form are sections designed to capture the child's background, including basic personal information, and the concerns leading to the evaluation, whether it's an initial evaluation or a reevaluation. Each evaluator involved contributes to the assessment, highlighting areas such as vision, hearing, and intellectual ability, using a variety of evaluation methods and strategies. Summaries of these assessments form the basis of a team summary, which is pivotal for understanding the child's educational needs and planning instruction and progress monitoring. Specifically, for cases where a specific learning disability is suspected, dedicated documentation is required to guide eligibility decisions. What's notable about the ETR process is its collaborative approach, ensuring that a team of professionals, alongside the child's parents or guardians, are involved in reviewing all pertinent information. This careful deliberation culminates in a decision regarding the child's eligibility for special education, which is documented in the final sections of the form, with provisions for dissenting opinions among team members. This form represents a structured attempt by the Ohio Department of Education, as indicated by its revision date on April 4, 2009, to standardize the evaluation process across districts, ensuring fairness and thoroughness in assessing each child's unique educational requirements.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Pro 6 Etr Form |
Form Length | 12 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 3 min |
Other names | etr form printable, etr form online, etr evaluation form, evaluation team form pdf |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S INFORMATION:
CHILD'S NAME: |
|
ID NUMBER: |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STREET: |
|
GENDER: |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY: |
|
|
|
|||||||
STATE: OH |
ZIP: |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRICT OF RESIDENCE:
DISTRICT OF SERVICE:
PARENTS'/GUARDIAN INFORMATION
NAME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
STREET: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
CITY: |
|
STATE: OH |
ZIP: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
HOME PHONE: |
|
WORK PHONE: |
|
|||||||||||||
CELL PHONE: |
|
EMAIL: |
|
|||||||||||||
NAME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
STREET: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
CITY: |
|
STATE: OH |
ZIP: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
HOME PHONE: |
|
WORK PHONE: |
||||||||||||||
CELL PHONE: |
|
EMAIL: |
|
TYPE OF EVALUATION:
INITIAL EVALUATION |
REEVALUATION |
GRADE:
DATES
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LAST ETR:
REFERRAL DATE:
DATE PARENTS
CONSENT RECEIVED:
ETR FORM STATUS
PART 1: INDIVIDUAL EVALUATOR'S ASSESSMENT (Separate Assessment from each Evaluator)
PART 2: TEAM SUMMARY
PART 3: DOCUMENTATION FOR DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY PART 4: ELIGIBILITY
PART 5. SIGNATURES
INSTRUCTIONS
There are four parts to this form, i.e., Part 1,2,3 and 4. Parts 1,2 and 4 must be completed for all initial evaluations and reevaluations. Part 3 must be completed for initial evaluations if the suspected area of disability is Specific Learning Disability. Part 3 must be completed for reevaluations if the child is currently a child identified as having a specific learning disability or the team is considering a change in the child's disability category to Specific Learning Disability.
In Part 1 each member of the evaluation team will list in the “Areas of Assessment” box the area or areas that they will be assessing, i.e., vision, hearing, fine motor, gross motor, emotional/behavioral or intellectual ability. The evaluator will also provide, in Part 1, the evaluation method and strategies used to conduct the assessment by checking the appropriate boxes. A detailed summary of the results of the assessment or assessments will be provided in the “Summary of Assessment Results” section. The evaluator will sign their assessment page and include his or her position title. The date on this section will be the date the evaluator completed his or her assessment.
Part 2 will be completed by the team chair or district representative by gathering all team members' assessments (Part 1) and summarizing them in the boxes provided in Part 2. The interventions summary is completed for both initial evaluations and reevaluations per the instructions found on the form and in Procedures and Guidance for Ohio Educational Agencies serving Children with Disabilities. The reason(s) for the evaluation is also completed for both initial and reevaluations. The summary of information provided by the parents of the child will include information from the referral form as well as any information provided by the parent through behavioral checklists, interviews or meetings, outside evaluations.
Once all assessment information is gathered and summarized, the team will meet and review all information. The team will then describe the child's educational needs based on the information gathered, and state the implications for instruction and progress monitoring in the appropriate text box.
The team will then consider whether or not the child may have a specific learning disability based on the elements found in Part 3. If no one suspects a disability under this category, the team may skip Part 3 and move into Part 4.
In Part 4 the team determines whether or not the child is eligible for special education and related services by addressing each of the statements found in this section. The final text box in this section is completed with the information that supports the team's eligibility determination. All members of the team sign the report at the conclusion of this section. If any team member disagrees with the team's determination, the team member must attach a written statement of disagreement to the report.
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 1 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME:ID NUMBER:DATE OF BIRTH:
1 |
INDIVIDUAL EVALUATOR'S ASSESSMENT |
Section to be completed by each individual evaluator |
EVALUATOR NAME:
POSITION:
AREAS OF ASSESSMENT:
Indicate the area(s) that were assessed by the evaluator in accordance with the evaluation plan.
EVALUATION METHODS AND STRATEGIES
Indicate the types of assessment strategies used to gather information about the child's performance
OBSERVATIONS
INTERVIEWS
REVIEW OF RECORDS AND RELEVANT TREND DATA (SCHOOL RECORDS, WORK
SAMPLES, EDUCATIONAL HISTORY)
SCIENTIFIC, |
||
INTERVENTIONS |
||
|
||
CURRICULUM BASED ASSESSMENTS |
CLASSROOM BASED ASSESSMENTS |
|
OTHER (Specify) |
|
ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Provide a summary of the information obtained from the assessment results per the evaluation plan including the child's strengths, areas of need and baseline data
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION OF EDUCATIONAL NEEDS:
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND PROGRESS MONITORING:
Evaluator's Signature: |
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 2 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME: |
ID NUMBER: |
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
2 TEAM SUMMARY |
|
|
Combine all Part 1's Individual Evaluator's Assessment from all evaluators into team summary
INTERVENTIONS SUMMARY
Provide a summary of all interventions done prior to the child's referral for an evaluation or done as part of the initial evaluation. For all reevaluations provide a summary of interventions routinely provided to this child.
REASON(S) FOR EVALUATION:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PARENTS OF THE CHILD:
SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: (only required for preschool and SLD)
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 3 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME: |
ID NUMBER: |
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
MEDICAL INFORMATION:
SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
DESCRIPTION OF EDUCATIONAL NEEDS:
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND PROGRESS MONITORING:
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 4 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME:ID NUMBER:DATE OF BIRTH:
3 DOCUMENTATION FOR DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF
A SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION
If the child has participated in a process that assesses the child's response to scientific, research based intervention, indicate if the parents were notified about the following prior to the evaluation:
The state's policies regarding the amount and nature of student performance data that |
YES |
NO |
|
||
would be collected and the general services that would be provided. (See Procedures |
|
|
and Guidance for Ohio Educational Agencies serving Children with Disabilities)
Strategies for increasing the child's rate of learning |
YES |
NO |
|
||
The parents right to request an evaluation |
YES |
NO |
|
||
Section A must be completed |
|
|
Either Section B or Section C must be completed |
|
|
A. IDENTIFIED AREAS
Identify one or more of the following areas in which the team has determined that the child is not achieving adequately for the child's age or
Oral Expression |
Reading Fluency Skills |
Written Expression |
Mathematics Calculation |
Listening Comprehension |
Reading Comprehension |
Basic Reading Skill |
Mathematics Problem solving |
|
|
|
|
B. RESPONSE TO SCIENTIFIC,
Assessment information should be summarized in this section if the evaluation team used a process based on a child's response to scientific,
C. PATTERNS OF STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Assessment information should be summarized in this section, if the evaluation team used alternative
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 5 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME:ID NUMBER:DATE OF BIRTH:
D. EXCLUSIONARY FACTORS
The evaluation team has determined that its findings are NOT primarily the result of:
A Visual, Hearing, or Motor Disability |
Limited English Proficiency |
Mental Retardation |
Environmental or Economic Disadvantage |
Emotional Disturbance |
Cultural Factors |
E. DOCUMENTATION- UNDERACHIEVEMENT NOT DUE TO A LACK OF APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION
Regardless of the process used to identify a child as having a specific learning disability, the team must ensure that the child's underachievement is not due to a lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math by considering the following information:
1.Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as part of the referral process, the child was provided appropriate instruction in general education settings, delivered by qualified personnel.
Summarize the data used by the team to document this requirement:
2.
Summarize the
F.OBSERVATION
Summarize the child's academic performance and behavior in the areas of difficulty as observed in the child's learning environment including the regular classroom setting.
G. MEDICAL FINDINGS
Describe the educationally relevant medical findings, if any:
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 6 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME: |
ID NUMBER: |
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
4 ELIGIBILITY
ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION
It is the determination of the team that:
The determining factor for the child's poor performance is not due to a lack of YES NO appropriate instruction in reading or math or the child's limited English proficiency. For
the
The child meets the state criteria for having a disability (or continuing to have a disability) based on the data provided in this document.
The child demonstrates an educational need that requires specially designed instruction
If the response is NO to any question, then the child is NOT eligible for special education. If the response to all three questions is YES, then the child IS eligible for special education.
The child is eligible for special education and related services in the category of:
YES NO
YES NO
BASIS FOR ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION: (or Continued Eligibility)
Provide a justification for the eligibility determination decision, describing how the student meets or does not meet the eligibility criteria as defined in OAC
child's progress in the general education curriculum.
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 7 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
CHILD'S NAME: |
ID NUMBER: |
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
5 SIGNATURES |
|
DATES |
|
|
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LAST ETR:
REFERRAL DATE:
EVALUATION TEAM
The names, titles and signatures below identify the members of the evaluation team and indicate whether or not each team member is in agreement with the conclusions of the report.
NAME |
TITLE |
SIGNATURE |
DATE |
|
|
STATUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF DISAGREEMENT
If a team member is not in agreement with the team's determination, the team member shall attach to this report a written statement explaining his or her reason for disagreeing with the team's determination.
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 8 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
EVALUATION PLANNING FORM
Preschool Disability Determination
CHILD'S NAME: |
|
|
DATE OF PLAN: |
||||||||
ID NUMBER: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INITIAL EVALUATION |
|||
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REEVALUATION |
|||
TEAM CHAIRPERSON: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
SUSPECTED DISABILITY: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
TEAM MEMBERS |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NOTE: |
|
|
|
|
1Information must be collected for all the areas in the
2.In the appropriate box, document each assessment which has already occurred . Indicate the title of the person who conducted the assessment and the date.
3.In the appropriate box, write the title of the person who will conduct the evaluation(s) needed for the MFE.
AREA(S) OF SUSPECTED
DEFICIT
BACKGROUND
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
COGNITIVE ABILITY
*COMMUNICATION
*HEARING ABILITY
*VISION ABILITY
PRE ACADEMIC SKILLS
*GROSS/FINE MOTOR
SKILLS
*SOCIAL/EMOTIONAL
BEHAVIORAL
MEDICAL/HEALTH
INFORMATION |
COMPLETE |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXISTING DATA REVIEW
STRUCTURED
INTERVIEW
STRUCTURED
OBSERVATIONS 2
STANDARDIZED
TESTS
CRITERION-
REFERENCED/ CURRICULUM- BASED TESTS
Preschool Child with a Disability: A child who 1) is at least three years of age and not yet six; 2) has a disability, demonstrated by a documented deficit in one or more areas** of development, which has an adverse effect upon normal development and functioning.
**Areas of deficit include 1) communication skills including form, content, and use of language, but not solely in speech articulation or phonology; 2) hearing abilities, 3) motor abilities, 4) social/emotional/behavioral functioning; or 5) vision abilities, or a combination of deficits which must include cognitive and/or adaptive behavior combined with one or more deficits in areas
The team has taken into cosideration limited English proficiency in planning this assessment
The team has taken into consideration possible sources of racial/cultural bias in planning the assessments.
SIGNATURES
School District Representative (Name/ Date) |
|
Parent (Name/ Date) |
|
|
|
Regular Education Teacher (Name/ Date) |
|
Intervention Specialist (Name/ Date) |
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 9 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
EVALUATION PLANNING FORM
School Age Disability Determination
CHILD'S NAME: |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF PLAN: |
||||||||
ID NUMBER: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INITIAL EVALUATION |
||||
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REEVALUATION |
||||
TEAM CHAIRPERSON: |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
SUSPECTED DISABILITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
TEAM MEMBERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSESSMENT AREAS RELATED TO SUSPECTED |
DATA |
FURTHER |
PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSMENT AND |
||||||||||
TESTING |
|||||||||||||
|
DISABILITY(IES) |
AVAILABLE1 |
REPORT |
||||||||||
|
NEEDED2 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Provided by Parent
General Intelligence
Academic Skills
Classroom Based Evaluations and
Progress in the General Curriculum
Data from Interventions
Communicative Status
Vision
Hearing
Social Emotional Status
Physical Exam/General Health
Gross Motor
Fine Motor
Vocational/Transition
Background History
Observations
Behavior Assessment
Adapted Behavior
Other: (circle) Braille needs as determined by
VI teacher or appropriately trained/licensed personnel. Audiological needs as determined by certified/ licensed audiologist.
Assistive Technology needs.
Other:
1Sufficient data to determine eligibility
2Additional data required to determine eligibility. Check if further testing is needed
The Team has taken into consideration limited English proficiency to plan this assessment.
The Team has taken into consideration possible sources of racial or cultural bias in planning this assessment
SIGNATURES
School District Representative (Name/ Date) |
|
Parents (Name/ Date) |
|
|
|
Regular Education Teacher (Name/ Date) |
|
Intervention Specialist (Name/ Date) |
|
|
|
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 10 of 10 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
EVALUATION PLANNING FORM
Preschool Eligibility Determination
CHILD'S NAME: |
|
|
DATE OF PLAN: |
||
ID NUMBER: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
INITIAL EVALUATION |
|
DATE OF BIRTH: |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
REEVALUATION |
|
|
|
|
|
TEAM CHAIRPERSON: |
|
|
TRANSITION FROM PART C |
|
|
|
|
||
SUSPECTED DISABILITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TEAM MEMBERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: |
|
|
|
1Each domain must be assessed using one of the methods listed.
2The areas related to the suspected disability must be assessed using all the methods listed (data from early intervention only applies if the child is transitioning from "Help Me Grow"**). Refer to the chart on the next page.
3Provide the name of the individual responsible for the required data.
ASSESSMENT AREAS
BACKGROUND
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
COGNITION
COMMUNICATION
HEARING
VISION
PRE ACADEMIC SKILLS
GROSS/FINE MOTOR SKILLS
SOCIAL/EMOTIONAL BEHAVIORAL
MEDICAL/HEALTH
EXISTING DATA AVAILABLE
ADDITIONAL DATA NEEDED
STRUCTURED |
STRUCTURED |
INTERVIEW |
OBSERVATIONS * |
|
|
STANDARDIZED
NORM-
REFERENCED ASSESSMENTS
CRITERION-
REFERENCED/ CURRICULUM- BASED ASSESSMENTS
DATA FROM
PART C**
* Observations are in more than one setting and in multiple activities.
The team has taken into consideration limited English proficiency in planning this assessment and determining eligibility as a preschool child with a disability.
The team has taken into consideration possible sources of racial/cultural bias in planning the assessments.
SIGNATURES
School District Representative (Name/ Date) |
|
Parent (Name/ Date) |
|
|
|
General Preschool/Regular Education Teacher (Name/ Date) |
|
Preschool Special Education Teacher (Name/ Date) |
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 1 of 2 |
ETR Evaluation Team Report
EVALUATION PLANNING FORM
Preschool Eligibility Determination
The following chart can assist the team planning for assessments and determining eligibility.
Suspected Disability:
Autism (AUT) |
Cognitive Disability (CD) |
Deaf- Blindness (DB) |
Deaf |
Emotional Disturbance (ED) |
Hearing Impairment (HI) |
Multiple Disabilities (MD) |
Orthopedic Impairment (OH) |
Other Health Impairment (OHI) |
Speech or Language Impairment (S/L) |
Specific Learning Disability (SLD) |
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) |
Visual Impairment (VI) |
Developmental Delay (DD) |
|
Based upon the suspected disability, the following areas should be considered in planning the evaluation. The team determines the assessment plan.
Related to disability category
Other areas recommended
ASSESSMENT AREAS |
AUT |
CD |
D/B DEAF ED |
HI |
MD |
OH |
OHI SLD |
S/L |
TBI |
VI |
DD2 |
PREVIOUS INTERVENTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGNITION1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREACADEMIC SKILLS3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEARING4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUDIOLOGICAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VISION4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNICATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORAL EXPRESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LISTENING COMPREHENSION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WRITTEN EXPRESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS MOTOR SKILLS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINE MOTOR SKILLS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOCIAL FUNCTIONING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMOTIONAL STATUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEHAVIORAL STATUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHYSICAL/MENTAL/HEALTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Intelligence quotient required for a cognitive disability only.
2All possible areas for developmental delay are noted. The team will decide the areas to be assessed for eligibility.
3Preacademic skills are related to content standards and basic functional skills for preschoolers and provide information on current level of performance.
4Vision and hearing screening are part of the basic requirements for entry into program, just like kindergarten, and are part of the Early Learning Program Guidelines,
A preschool child is determined eligible because of a disability that (1) adversely affects the child's performance and ability to participate in developmentally appropriate activities and therefore, (2) the child is in need of special education and relate services.
Eligibility in a disability category other than developmental delay must be determined first. If the child is eligible with a disability category of speech/language impairment, cognitive disability or emotional disturbance, the team may choose to use the term developmental delay without any further assessments. If the child does not meet the criteria for any of these disability categories, the team is to consider developmental delay. Developmental Delay means the child has a disability in one or more of the following areas of development: physical, cognitive, communication, social or emotional, or adaptive. A developmental delay is substantiated by a delay of 2.0 standard deviations below the mean in one area of development or 1.5 standard deviations below the mean in two areas of development. The standard deviation cannot be the sole factor in determining the child has a disability.
A preschool child with a disability is at least age 3 and not of compulsory school age. A child who will be three as of December 1 of the school year can begin earlier than the third birthday. a child who will be age 5 as of December 1 is to have kindergarten
Additional data beyond what is necessary for eligibility may be collected and reviewed for programming purposes.
PR0 6- ETR FORM REVISED BY ODE: APRIL 4 , 2009 |
PAGE 2 of 2 |