In an era where the expectations on healthcare professionals are continually rising, the 14th Edition of Tidy's Physiotherapy serves as an essential guide for physiotherapists striving to excel in their profession. This comprehensive form encapsulates the multifaceted nature of physiotherapy, emphasizing the responsibilities that come with the title, both ethically and practically. With insights into becoming a professional within the UK context, it covers the essence of professionalism, clinical governance, evidence-based practice, and the evolution towards autonomy within the field. The form highlights the importance of continuous professional development, national standards, and service evaluation in delivering high-quality, patient-centered care. It stresses the significance of meeting societal and governmental expectations for healthcare delivery, acknowledging the profession's privileged status while also exploring future challenges. The form acknowledges that physiotherapists enter the field with a commitment to improving lives, and it meticulously outlines how they can make this a reality amidst changing healthcare landscapes. Furthermore, it underscores the unique skills and knowledge physiotherapists bring to their practice, advocating for a patient-partnership model in clinical decision-making. As the profession navigates its evolving role within the UK's health services, Tidy's Physiotherapy 14th Edition form serves as a vital resource for professionals committed to upholding the highest standards of care.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Tidys Physiotherapy 14Th Edition Form |
| Form Length | 19 pages |
| Fillable? | No |
| Fillable fields | 0 |
| Avg. time to fill out | 4 min 45 sec |
| Other names | tidy's physiotherapy 12th edition book pdf, tidy's physiotherapy pdf download, tidy's physiotherapy pdf, tidys physiotherapy 12th edition pdf download |
Porter: Tidy's Physiotherapy, 14th Edition
1
Chapter 1
The responsibilities of being a physiotherapist
Ralph Hammond and Julie Dawn Wheeler
CHAPTER CONTENTS |
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
FINAL |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
This chapter aims to provide the reader with an insight |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Introduction |
1 |
|
|
|
|
into what it means to be a professional (in the context |
|||||||||
Characteristics of being a professional |
2 |
|
of this |
chapter, |
a physiotherapist), |
focusing on the |
|||||||||
|
responsibilities, both ethical and practical, that are |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Responsibilities of being a professional |
5 |
|
inherent in claiming to be a professional working in |
||||||||||||
Becoming an autonomous profession |
6 |
|
the UK. |
- |
NOT |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current status and privilege of physiotherapists |
|||||||
Clinical governance |
7 |
|
|
|
as autonomous professionals will be placed in the con- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
OF |
|
ELSEVIER |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
text of the history of the profession, and the impact of |
|||||||||||||
|
|
autonomy on clinical practice will be explored. The |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Clinical effectiveness |
10 |
|
|
chapter will reflect on the implications for physiothera- |
|||||||||||
|
|
pists of the increasing expectations of both the general |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
public and the government for health professionals to |
|||||||||
Applying national standards and guidelines |
|
||||||||||||||
locally 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
deliver |
|||||||||
Evaluating services |
12 |
|
|
|
how |
physiotherapists can |
meet |
these expectations |
|||||||
|
|
|
through clinical governance will be provided. Finally, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Continuing professional development |
13 |
|
the reader will be offered a look at the possible future |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
CONTENTof the profession in light of the changing shape of |
||||||||||
Having the right workforce (and using it |
|
health services in the UK. |
|
|
|
||||||||||
appropriately) 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Physiotherapists come into the profession because |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Monitoring clinical governance |
15 |
|
|
they have an underlying sense of |
and commitment |
||||||||||
The future |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
to |
helping others and improving |
their quality of |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
life. Indeed, Koehn (1994) argues that professionals |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Sources of critical appraisal tools |
17 |
|
|
can be |
thought |
of as being |
defined |
by a distinctive |
|||||||
PROPERTY |
|
|
commitment to |
benefit the client. |
Physiotherapists |
||||||||||
Acknowledgements |
18 |
|
|
|
want to be able to use their acquisition of knowledge, |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
References |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
skills |
and attributes from qualifying |
programmes to |
||||||
|
SAMPLE |
|
|
benefit people, in whatever specialty or with whichever |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
patient group they wish to work once qualified |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for example, elite athletes, older people, people with |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
developmental or acquired conditions, people with |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mental health problems. This chapter will help readers |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
understand how they can |
make |
benefiting patients |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a reality in the context of the expectations of society |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the provision of |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
care. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780443103926
Porter: Tidy's Physiotherapy, 14th Edition
2THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING A PHYSIOTHERAPIST
1 |
|
While earlier editions of Tidy’s Physiotherapy may |
|
The professional body for physiotherapists, the |
||||||||||
have been popular for their prescriptive descriptions |
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP), provides a |
|||||||||||||
|
of what physiotherapists should do in particular situa- |
framework for the curriculum of physiotherapy educa- |
||||||||||||
|
tions or for specific conditions, this edition demands |
tion and approves those physiotherapy programmes |
||||||||||||
|
more from the reader. No two patients are quite the |
that meet the requirements of the framework on behalf |
||||||||||||
|
same; each requires the skills of the physiotherapist to |
of the profession. |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
carry out a full and accurate assessment, taking account |
|
The CSP also publishes rules of professional conduct |
|||||||||||
|
of the individuality of the patient, and then to use clini- |
and standards of physiotherapy practice derived from |
||||||||||||
|
cal reasoning to |
within the profession, which are in harmony with those |
||||||||||||
|
options for treatment, on which the patient will make |
of the HPC. Anyone on the HPC physiotherapist regis- |
||||||||||||
|
a decision. A professional is required to have the matu- |
ter may call themselves a physiotherapist; only those |
||||||||||||
|
rity to take full responsibility for the privilege of auton- |
who are members of the CSP may call themselves a |
||||||||||||
|
omy. This will be by maintaining a competence to |
chartered physiotherapist. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
practise through |
|
The breadth of activity and resources that the CSP |
|||||||||||
|
undertakes and provides seek to establish a level of excel- |
|||||||||||||
|
present practice; by keeping up to date with the most |
lence for the profession. Its education and professional |
||||||||||||
|
effective interventions; and by maintaining the trust of |
activity is centred on leading and supporting members’ |
||||||||||||
|
patients by doing good. Readers should realise that |
delivery of |
||||||||||||
|
while this approach is more challenging, it will also |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL |
|||||
|
activity emanates from its status as the professional body |
|||||||||||||
|
be more rewarding. |
|
|
|
|
for physiotherapy in the UK and therefore as the primary |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
holder and shaper of physiotherapy practice. The CSP |
|||||||
|
|
CHARACTERISTICS OF BEING |
|
|
|
works on behalf of the profession to protect the chartered |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
status of physiotherapists’ standing, which is one denot- |
|||||||||
|
|
A PROFESSIONAL |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOT |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ing excellence. It is worth noting that the relationship with |
|||||||
|
|
Becoming a professional requires an acceptance, often |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
the HPC is one of registrant; with the CSP it is one of |
||||||||||||
|
|
implied, of certain responsibilities, in return for certain |
membership. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
ELSEVIER |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
privileges. These responsibilities require certain beha- |
|
While the principles of professionalism should be |
||||||||||
|
|
viours and attitudes of individuals in whom profes- |
aspired to by physiotherapists anywhere in the world, |
|||||||||||
|
|
sional trust is placed. Broadly, professionalism requires |
the existence and/or role of regulators and professional |
|||||||||||
|
|
these attributes: |
|
OF |
|
|
bodies and the way these characteristics are manifested |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
may vary, depending on political, social and financial |
||||||||
|
▪ a motivation to deliver service to others |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
▪ adherence to a moral and ethical code of practice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
▪ striving for excellence, maintaining an awareness of |
|
Belonging to an organisation that sets |
|||||||||||
|
|
limitations and scope of practice |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
standards and ideals of behaviour |
||||||||
|
▪ the empowerment of others (Hodkinson 1995 and |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
CONTENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Medical Professionalism Project 2002, both cited in |
|
The Rules of Professional Conduct (the Rules) were |
||||||||||
|
|
CSP 2005b). |
|
|
|
|
|
endorsed at the very first council meeting of the CSP |
||||||
|
|
To practise in the |
profession of |
physiotherapy |
in |
|
in 1895 |
(Barclay 1994) |
|
and have been revised and |
||||
|
|
|
updated at intervals since. The Rules define the profes- |
|||||||||||
|
the UK, registration |
with the statutory regulator |
is |
|
||||||||||
|
|
sional behaviour expected of chartered physiothera- |
||||||||||||
|
required. The Health Professions Council (HPC) sets |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
pists. The current Rules set out a number of principles, |
||||||||||||
|
standards of professional training, |
performance and |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
the basis for all of which is to safeguard patients (CSP |
||||||||||||
|
conductPROPERTYfor thirteen professions, including physiother- |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2002a). |
They include |
requirements that chartered |
||||||||||
|
apy (HPC 2006). It keeps a register of health profes- |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
physiotherapists should: |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
sionals that meet its standards, and it takes action if |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
SAMPLE |
|
|
▪ respect the dignity and individual sensibilities of |
|||||||||
|
registered health professionals do not meet those stan- |
|||||||||||||
|
dards. It was created by the Health Professions Order |
|
every patient |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
2001 (HPC 2002). Only those registered with the HPC |
▪ work safely and competently |
||||||||||||
|
may call themselves a physiotherapist/physical thera- |
▪ ensure the confidentiality of patient information |
||||||||||||
|
pist (HPC 2006). It is the duty of registrants to keep |
▪ report circumstances that might otherwise put |
||||||||||||
|
up to date with the processes and requirements decreed |
|
patients at risk |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
by the Regulator; this is particularly important currently |
▪ not exploit patients |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
because of the changing attitudes to, and legislation of, |
▪ act in a way that reflects credit on the profession and |
||||||||||||
|
healthcare professions in recent times. |
|
|
|
does not cause offence to patients. |
|||||||||
http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780443103926
Porter: Tidy's Physiotherapy, 14th Edition
Characteristics of being a professional 3
on informed consent. This is a good example of how
the Standards and Rules complement each other. They 1 should be used together to ensure compliance with
the characteristics and actions required of members of the physiotherapy profession.
Commitment to discipline other members
As of 15 October 2006 the CSP no longer handles com- plaints concerning the professional conduct or fitness to
▪ involving patients in |
|
|
practise of its members, except those described in the |
|||||||||
▪ being fully abreast of the evidence of effectiveness |
||||||||||||
next paragraph. The HPC considers all complaints of |
||||||||||||
in order to inform patients and offer the most effec- |
||||||||||||
this nature. |
|
|
||||||||||
tive interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Society |
does however, handle complaints or |
|||||
▪ evaluating their practice and measuring a patient’s |
||||||||||||
consider matters of fitness to practise concerning mem- |
||||||||||||
health gain as a result of treatment. |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
bers of the Society who are not regulated by the HPC. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
This reflects the increasing expectations of the public to |
(This includes physiotherapist’s physiotherapy treat- |
|||||||||||
be active partners in their healthcare, the expectations |
ment of animals, students and the CSP’s associate |
|||||||||||
of clinical governance to provide more effective care, |
members (CSP 2006).) |
FINAL |
||||||||||
and the growing demands of funders of services, as |
|
|
||||||||||
Possessing knowledge and skills not shared |
||||||||||||
well as patients, to be able to demonstrate the benefits |
||||||||||||
by others |
|
|
||||||||||
or ‘added value’ of physiotherapy. All these will be dis- |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
cussed later in the chapter. |
|
|
|
|
|
Any profession possesses a range of specific knowledge |
||||||
Standards of Physiotherapy Practice is written in a way |
and skills that are either unique, or more significantly |
|||||||||||
that offers a broad statement of intent (the Standard |
|
NOT |
|
|||||||||
developed than in other professions. The World Congress |
||||||||||||
statement), which is followed by a number of measur- |
- |
|
|
|||||||||
for Physical Therapy (WCPT) has described the nature of |
||||||||||||
able statements about expected performance or activity |
physiotherapy as ‘providing services to people and popu- |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELSEVIER |
|
|||
by the physiotherapist, student or assistant (known as |
lations to develop, maintain and restore maximum move- |
|||||||||||
‘criteria’). For example, Core Standard 2 states ‘Patients |
ment and functional ability throughout the lifespan’ |
|||||||||||
are given relevant information about the proposed |
(WCPT 1999). |
|
|
|||||||||
physiotherapy |
procedure, |
taking into account |
their |
It adds, in a detailed description, that physical ther- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
OF |
|
apy is ‘concerned with identifying and maximising |
||||
age, emotional state and cognitive ability, to allow |
||||||||||||
informed consent.’ The criteria for this standard include |
movement potential, within the spheres of promotion, |
|||||||||||
the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prevention, treatment and rehabilitation’ (ibid, p28). |
||||
▪ The patient’s consent is obtained before starting any |
WCPT identifies the interaction between ‘physical |
|||||||||||
therapist, patients or clients, families and care givers, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
examination/treatment. |
|
|
CONTENTin a process of assessing movement potential and in |
|||||||||
▪ Treatment |
options, including |
significant |
benefits, |
establishing agreed upon goals and objectives’ as cru- |
||||||||
risks and |
||||||||||||
cial and acknowledges that |
this requires knowledge |
|||||||||||
▪ The patient |
is |
given |
the |
opportunity |
to |
ask |
||||||
and skills unique to physical therapists (ibid, p28). |
||||||||||||
questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK, |
one approach |
to conceptualising phy- |
||
▪ The patient is informed of the right to decline phys- |
||||||||||||
siotherapy has been to focus on three core elements: mas- |
||||||||||||
iotherapy |
at |
any |
stage |
without that prejudicing |
||||||||
sage, exercise and electrophysical modalities (CSP 2002a). |
||||||||||||
future care. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For physiotherapy, the roots of the profession can be |
|||||
PROPERTY |
|
|
|
|||||||||
▪ The patient’s consent to the treatment plan is docu- |
found in massage, the founders of the profession having |
|||||||||||
mented in the patient’s record. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
been a group of nurses who carried out massage. The sig- |
||||||||
|
SAMPLE |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
nificance of therapeutic touching of patients still sets |
||||||||
These measurable criteria allow performance to be |
||||||||||||
assessed against them, through clinical audit, described |
physiotherapy aside from other professions. Physiothera- |
|||||||||||
in more detail later. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pists continue to use massage therapeutically as well as a |
|||||
The content of this standard and accompanying |
wide range of other manual techniques such as manipu- |
|||||||||||
criteria set out the specific actions required in order to |
lation and reflex therapy. Therapeutic handling under- |
|||||||||||
conform, in this case, to an aspect of Rule 2 of Rules of |
pins many aspects of rehabilitation, requiring the |
|||||||||||
Professional Conduct: ‘Chartered physiotherapists shall |
touching of patients to facilitate movement. |
|||||||||||
respect and uphold the rights, dignity and individual |
Another description of the profession’s knowledge |
|||||||||||
sensibilities of every patient,’ which includes guidance |
and skills can be found in the Curriculum Framework |
|||||||||||
http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780443103926