Fostering an environment of continuous improvement and learning is a key objective within educational settings, making the Tutor Evaluation form a critical tool in achieving this goal. Designed for peer assessment within writing centers or tutoring programs, this form guides the evaluation of a tutor's performance across multiple dimensions. Evaluators rate the tutor in areas such as the initial greeting to clients, the ability to let clients set their own learning agenda, prioritization of higher-order concerns over stylistic and mechanical issues, the use of open-ended questions, and the overall accuracy of the advice given. The rating scale ranges from "Superior" to "Needs Improvement," providing clear benchmarks for feedback. Additionally, the form includes sections for observers to note particular strengths of the tutor's approach as well as suggestions for further development. This structured yet flexible format not only aims to enhance the effectiveness of individual tutors but also supports the broader goal of elevating the quality of tutoring services provided.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Tutor Evaluation Form |
| Form Length | 1 pages |
| Fillable? | Yes |
| Fillable fields | 1 |
| Avg. time to fill out | 27 sec |
| Other names | printable tutoring forms, demonstrated, PEER, friendliness |
WRITING CENTER ADVANCED TUTOR
PEER EVALUATION FORM DATE: ____________________________________________
CONSULTANT: _____________________________________
OBSERVER: ________________________________________
Rate the consultant on her/his performance in the following areas. The ratings, from highest to lowest, are “Superior,” “Adequate,” or “Needs Improvement.” Circle one.
1.The consultant greeted the client and demonstrated concern and friendliness throughout the session.
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
2.The consultant made a real effort to let the client set the agenda and to give the client responsibility for making his/her own decisions.
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
3.The consultant addressed higher order concerns (ideas and organization) before addressing questions of style and mechanics.
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
4.The consultant asked
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
5.At the end of the session, the consultant asked the client to articulate what specific areas she/he planned to work on next.
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
6. The consultant’s advice seemed accurate.
SUPERIOR |
ADEQUATE |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
I was impressed by the following in the tutor’s work:
To improve, the tutor might want to try the following: