The Arid West Wetland Determination Data Form represents a crucial tool designed for systematically evaluating and establishing the presence of wetland conditions within the arid regions of the Western United States. By meticulously capturing details ranging from basic project information, such as the site location, to more intricate data involving soil, vegetation, and hydrology, this form sets a foundation for accurate wetland assessment. It prompts the investigator to record observations about the project area, including landform, local relief, and slope, as well as more specific data like soil type, vegetation cover, and hydrological indicators. Moreover, it addresses the occurrence of natural disturbances or problematic conditions that might affect the wetland determination process. The inclusion of summary findings, along with a site map, enriches the form's utility as a comprehensive resource for environmental assessments. The detailed approach to documenting vegetation types, soil profile characteristics, and hydrological conditions underscores the rigorous standards applied to wetland identification in arid terrains, with a subtle emphasis on the relevant impacts of climatic and hydrologic variability typical of these regions. This document, delineated by the US Army Corps of Engineers, is not just a procedural formality but a vital instrument for ensuring responsible land use and conservation in areas where water resources are both scarce and critically important.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Arid West Wetland Determination Form |
Form Length | 2 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 30 sec |
Other names | determination data arid, form west region, data arid west form, wetland determination form arid |
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Arid West Region
Project/Site: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City/County: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sampling Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Applicant/Owner: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State: |
|
Sampling Point: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Investigator(s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section, Township, Range: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local relief (concave, convex, none): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slope (%): |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Subregion (LRR): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lat: |
|
|
|
|
Long: |
|
|
|
|
Datum: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Soil Map Unit Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NWI classification: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
(If no, explain in Remarks.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Are Vegetation |
|
|
, Soil |
|
|
, or Hydrology |
|
significantly disturbed? |
|
Are “Normal Circumstances” present? |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are Vegetation |
|
|
, Soil |
|
|
, or Hydrology |
|
naturally problematic? |
|
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) |
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? |
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
Is the Sampled Area |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydric Soil Present? |
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
within a Wetland? |
Yes |
|
No |
|||||
Wetland Hydrology Present? |
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks:
VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute |
|
|
Dominant |
|
Indicator |
|
Dominance Test worksheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Tree Stratum |
(Plot size: |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
% Cover |
|
|
Species? |
|
Status |
|
Number of Dominant Species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: |
|||||||||||||||
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Dominant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Species Across All Strata: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Dominant Species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Total Cover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A/B) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: |
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevalence Index worksheet: |
|
|
||||||||||||
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total % Cover of: |
|
|
|
|
Multiply by: |
|
|
||||||
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OBL species |
|
|
|
|
x 1 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FACW species |
|
|
|
|
x 2 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAC species |
|
|
|
|
x 3 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Herb Stratum |
(Plot size: |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Total Cover |
|
FACU species |
|
|
|
|
x 4 = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UPL species |
|
|
|
|
x 5 = |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column Totals: |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
(B) |
|||||||||
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevalence Index = B/A = |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominance Test is >50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) |
|
|
||||||||||||
8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) |
||||||||||||||
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: |
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Total Cover |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must |
||||||||||||||
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be present, unless disturbed or problematic. |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrophytic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Total Cover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum |
|
|
% Cover of Biotic Crust |
|
|
|
|
|
Present? |
Yes |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers |
Arid West – Version 2.0 |
SOIL |
Sampling Point: |
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth |
Matrix |
|
|
|
Redox Features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(inches) |
Color (moist) |
% |
|
Color (moist) |
% |
|
Type1 |
|
Loc2 |
|
|
Texture |
|
Remarks |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. |
|
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. |
|||||||||||||
|
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) |
|
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Histosol (A1) |
|
|
Sandy Redox (S5) |
|
|
|
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Histic Epipedon (A2) |
|
|
Stripped Matrix (S6) |
|
|
|
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Black Histic (A3) |
|
|
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) |
|
|
|
Reduced Vertic (F18) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) |
|
|
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) |
|
|
|
Red Parent Material (TF2) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) |
|
|
Depleted Matrix (F3) |
|
|
|
Other (Explain in Remarks) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) |
|
|
Redox Dark Surface (F6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) |
|
|
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Thick Dark Surface (A12) |
|
|
Redox Depressions (F8) |
|
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and |
|||||||||
|
|
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) |
|
|
Vernal Pools (F9) |
|
|
wetland hydrology must be present, |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) |
|
|
|
|
|
unless disturbed or problematic. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Restrictive Layer (if present): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depth (inches): |
|
|
|
Hydric Soil Present? Yes |
No |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Remarks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HYDROLOGY
|
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) |
|
|
|
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Surface Water (A1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt Crust (B11) |
|
|
|
|
Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
High Water Table (A2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotic Crust (B12) |
|
|
|
|
Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) |
|
|||||||
|
|
Saturation (A3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) |
|
|
|
|
Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) |
|
|
|
|
Drainage Patterns (B10) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) |
|
|
|
|
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) |
|
|
|
|
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) |
|
|
|
|
Crayfish Burrows (C8) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Surface Soil Cracks (B6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) |
|
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) |
|
|
Thin Muck Surface (C7) |
|
|
|
|
Shallow Aquitard (D3) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Explain in Remarks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field Observations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface Water Present? |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
Depth (inches): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Water Table Present? |
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
Depth (inches): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Saturation Present? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
Depth (inches): |
|
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes |
No |
|
|||||||||||||
|
(includes capillary fringe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers |
Arid West – Version 2.0 |