The HQ USAREC Form, specifically designed for the Letter of Recommendation segment of the Warrant Officer Procurement Program, stands as a quintessential document within the military's personnel advancement realm. Governed by an array of legal foundations, including Title 10 of the United States Code and various sections therein, alongside Executive Order 9397, this form embodies the legal amalgamation and procedural adherence requisite for the consideration and eventual selection of warrant officer candidates. Its primary purpose rests in the collection and presentation of comprehensive, qualitative evaluations of candidates, emphasizing leadership, character, and professional aptitude. These evaluations, crafted by those with direct supervisory or collegial relationships to the applicants, play a pivotal role in the selection board's decisions. Detailed guidance suggests the inclusion of specific, quantifiable insights into the candidate’s competencies, significantly enhancing the narrative's impact. Additionally, the form's voluntary nature, underscored by the potential consequences of non-disclosure, hints at the nuanced balance between requisite transparency and the individual's autonomy in the application process. Thus, this form not only facilitates a systematic approach to warrant officer selection but also encapsulates key legal and procedural underpinnings, ensuring a fair, merit-based assessment of potential warrant officers.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Hq Usarec Form 1936 |
| Form Length | 1 pages |
| Fillable? | No |
| Fillable fields | 0 |
| Avg. time to fill out | 15 sec |
| Other names | hq usarec form 3 3 example, pre execution checklist, hq usarec form 1936 instruction, hq usarec form 3 3 sample |
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION
(Warrant Officer Procurement Program)
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
AUTHORITY: Collection of this information is authorized by Title 10, USC, Sections 503, 505, 508, 3013, and 12102 and Executive Order 9397.
PRINCIPAL PURPOSE: Information collected will be used by selection board members to determine qualifications of warrant officer candidates.
ROUTINE USES: Blanket routine use disclosures as described in AR
DISCLOSURE: Voluntary; however, failure to provide the information may delay or terminate the warrant officer candidate's application process.
SECTION I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
1. NAME (Last, first, middle initial): |
2. SSN: |
3. RANK: |
4. DATE OF RANK: |
SAMPLE, Joe E. |
|
|
SGT |
|
1 SEPTEMBER 2002 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. UNIT, ORGANIZATION, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND: |
6. I am completing this form as the applicant's: |
|||||||
C DET |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Warrant Officer |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Company Grade Officer |
|||
FT ATTERBURY, KY 40121 |
|
|
|
|
|
Field Grade Officer |
||
(CENTCOM) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. RELATIONSHIP TO APPLICANT (i.e., supervisor, interviewer) : |
|||
7. I have known this applicant from |
2004/12 |
to |
PRESENT . |
Interviewer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Year/Month) |
|
(Year/Month) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION II - NARRATIVE
(Write a narrative explaining the applicant's leadership qualities, character, experience, and special expertise that uniquely qualify him or her to serve as a future warrant officer.)
NARRATIVE:
1.Letters should be should be 3 to 5 paragraphs with specific, quantifiable comments about the service members character and tactical and technical competence.
2.You may use information from the service member's entire record, including comments about schools completed, assignments, deployments, impact awards, achievements and accomplishments.
3.Generic flowery comments are not effective in communicating the service member's attributes to board members. If you can change the name of the person being recommended to someone else and the comments are not false, then the letter is probably too generic to communicate effectively to board members.
EXAMPLE
1.It is my absolute privilege to recommend SGT Sample for entry into the Warrant Officer Procurement Program as a Human Resources Technician (420A). I have reviewed SGT Sample’s credentials and found his records very worthy for warrant officer candidacy. As such, SGT Sample has earned my vote of confidence to compete for warrant officer selection.
2.SGT Sample served with me during a
Without question, SGT Sample superbly performed AG Wartime Functions in accordance with FM
3.SGT Sample possesses the qualities of a
4.In conclusion, SGT Sample has a rare blend of technical and tactical proficiency as evident by his outstanding military career. For this reason, I gladly recommend him for acceptance into the Warrant Officer Corps as a Human Resources Technician (420A)
SECTION III - DISCLAIMER
Notice: I understand by submitting this recommendation I am endorsing this applicant to be boarded for warrant officer selection.
SECTION IV - SIGNATURE
1.NAME (Last, first, middle initial):
DOE, John Q.
2. RANK:
CW4
3. BRANCH: |
4. SIGNATURE: |
AG
5.DATE (YYYYMMDD):
HQ USAREC Form 1936, Rev |
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE |
V4.00 |