Navigating the complexities of grievance procedures within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) can be daunting for employees seeking to address employment-related concerns. Established on November 1, 2009, the TDCJ's PD-30 (rev. 7) guidelines serve as a beacon for employees wishing to formally present their grievances. These guidelines meticulously outline the authorized frameworks, applicability criteria, and underscore an employment at will clause, ensuring that the provisions may evolve as necessitated by internal operations or policy revisions. This procedural document champions the principles of equal employment opportunity by barring any forms of discrimination within the grievance process, thereby creating a safe harbor for employees against harassment or retaliation when voicing grievances. Key components include the stipulations for submission, grievable versus non-grievable issues, representation rights, and the essential elements every grievance must encompass to warrant consideration. Moreover, the three-step grievance process delineated offers a structured route towards problem resolution, starting from an initial submission to potential escalation, thereby ensuring that every employee grievance receives a fair hearing and an equitable solution. Through a blend of structured procedural steps and safeguarding employee rights, TDCJ's PD-30 (rev. 7) guidelines not only aim to rectify employment-related concerns but also foster an environment of fundamental fairness and integrity within the workplace.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Tdcj Grievance Form |
| Form Length | 34 pages |
| Fillable? | No |
| Fillable fields | 0 |
| Avg. time to fill out | 8 min 30 sec |
| Other names | grievance grievant pers, grievance pers form search, grievance pers template, authority pers tdcj online |
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
NOVEMBER 1, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION |
|
|
PAGE NUMBER |
|
AUTHORITY |
1 |
|||
APPLICABILITY |
1 |
|||
EMPLOYMENT AT WILL CLAUSE |
1 |
|||
POLICY STATEMENT |
1 |
|||
DEFINITIONS |
2 |
|||
DISCUSSION |
3 |
|||
PROCEDURES |
|
|
||
I. |
Dissemination |
4 |
||
II. |
Submission of a Grievance |
4 |
||
|
A. |
General Provisions |
4 |
|
|
|
1. |
Compliance with Procedures |
4 |
|
|
2. |
Employee Grievance Form |
4 |
|
|
3. |
Grievant Requirements |
5 |
|
|
4. |
Use of State Resources |
5 |
|
B. |
Grievable and |
5 |
|
|
C. |
Representation |
6 |
|
|
|
1. |
Limitations |
6 |
|
|
2. |
Designating a Representative |
6 |
|
|
3. |
General Provisions |
6 |
|
D. |
Witnesses Presented by the Grievant |
7 |
|
|
E. |
Essential Elements of a Grievance |
7 |
|
|
|
1. |
Complaint |
7 |
|
|
2. |
Adverse Effect |
8 |
|
|
3. |
Corrective Action or Requested Relief |
8 |
|
F. |
Initial Submission of Grievance |
8 |
|
|
G. |
Submission Time Limits |
9 |
|
|
|
1. |
Grievances Relating to a |
9 |
I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 2 |
|
|
2. |
Grievances Relating to a Dismissal Recommendation |
10 |
|
|
3. |
Grievances Relating to Continuing Conditions |
10 |
|
H. |
Grievance Review Process |
10 |
|
|
|
1. |
Unit/Department Grievance Contact’s Responsibilities |
10 |
|
|
2. |
Review by an Intake Officer |
10 |
|
I. |
Grievance Not Accepted |
12 |
|
|
|
1. |
Intake Officer’s Responsibilities |
12 |
|
|
2. |
Unit/Department Grievance Contact’s Responsibilities |
12 |
|
J. |
Grievant’s Responsibilities for Resubmission |
12 |
|
|
K. |
Grievance Accepted |
13 |
|
III. |
Grievance Steps for Accepted Grievances |
14 |
||
|
A. |
General Provisions |
14 |
|
|
|
1. |
Responding Authority |
14 |
|
|
2. |
Availability of Three Steps |
15 |
|
|
3. |
Circumventing the |
15 |
|
|
4. |
Grievant’s Election to Have Grievance Returned |
16 |
|
|
5. |
Witnesses Presented by the Responding Authority |
16 |
|
B. |
Processing Accepted Grievances |
16 |
|
|
|
1. |
Step One |
16 |
|
|
2. |
Step Two or Step Three |
16 |
|
|
3. |
Grievance Referral (Step One or Step Two) |
17 |
|
C. |
Requirement to Hold a Grievance Meeting |
17 |
|
|
D. |
Scheduling a Grievance Meeting and Notifying Employee |
18 |
|
|
|
1. |
General Provisions |
18 |
|
|
2. |
Scheduling Time Frames and Notification |
19 |
|
E. |
Notifying the Grievant’s Representative of a Grievance Meeting |
19 |
|
|
F. |
Conducting a Grievance Meeting |
19 |
|
|
G. |
Grievant’s Failure to Appear at a Grievance Meeting |
19 |
|
|
H. |
Grievance Response |
20 |
|
|
|
1. |
Response Time Limits |
20 |
|
|
2. |
Response Time Limit Extensions |
20 |
|
|
3. |
Identification of Next Step Responding Authority |
21 |
|
|
4. |
Distribution of Grievance Response |
21 |
IV. |
Grievant’s Acceptance or Rejection of Response |
21 |
||
V. |
Separation from Employment when Grievance is in Process |
23 |
||
Attachment A PERS 155, “Employee Grievance Form” (11/09) Attachment B PERS 329, “Grievance Referral Form” (11/09)
Attachment C PERS 491, “Notification of Employee Grievance Meeting” (11/09) Attachment D PERS 328, “Time Limit Extension” (11/09)
Attachment E PERS 586, “Grievance Tracking Log (11/09)
II
TEXAS DEPARTMENT |
NUMBER: |
|
OF |
DATE: |
November 1, 2009 |
CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
PAGE: |
Page 1 of 32 |
|
SUPERSEDES: |
|
|
|
October 1, 2007 |
EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE
SUBJECT: |
EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES |
AUTHORITY: Texas Government Code §§ 493.007 and 617.005
Reference: American Correctional Association (ACA) Standard:
APPLICABILITY: All
EMPLOYMENT AT WILL CLAUSE:
These guidelines do not constitute an employment contract or a guarantee of continued employment. The TDCJ reserves the right to change the provisions of these guidelines at any time.
Nothing in these guidelines and procedures limits the executive director’s authority to establish or revise human resources policy. These guidelines and procedures are adopted to guide the internal operations of the TDCJ and do not create any legally enforceable interest or limit the executive director’s, deputy executive director’s, or division directors’ authority to terminate an employee at will.
POLICY:
The TDCJ promotes equal employment opportunity through a process designed to provide responses to employee grievances without regard to race, color, religion, sex (gender), national origin, age (40 or above), disability, genetic information, or Uniformed Services status. The TDCJ has zero tolerance for all forms of employment discrimination in the employee grievance process. No employee shall be subjected to harassment or retaliation for opposing or reporting employment discrimination in the employee grievance process.
Page 2 of 32
Employees of the TDCJ shall be treated fairly and equitably. Employees who believe they have not been treated fairly and equitably in regard to
Employees and employees’ representatives or witnesses shall not be subjected to harassment, retaliation, intimidation, or coercion for pursuing a grievance or acting as a representative or witness in the grievance process.
DEFINITIONS:
“Adverse Effect” is unreasonable interference with an employee’s ability to perform the employee’s job or with other
“Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Rule Violation” is a violation of one of the following TDCJ Employee General Rules of Conduct (as published and described in
“Grievance” is a formal written complaint filed by an employee in accordance with this directive and submitted on a PERS 155, Employee Grievance Form (Attachment A) regarding an
“Grievance Meeting” is a meeting between a grievant, the grievant’s designated representative (if designated), and a TDCJ official to discuss the grievance.
“Grievant” is an employee who pursues a grievance under the procedures set forth in this directive.
Page 3 of 32
“Intake Officer” is a specialist located within Employee Relations, Human Resources Headquarters, who receives, evaluates, and processes complaints, advises employees, and managers of the available options to resolve
“Offender” is an individual under the supervision, custody, or incarceration of the TDCJ, including a TDCJ offender housed in
“Representative” is a person who represents a grievant in a grievance meeting.
“Reprimanding Authority” is a TDCJ official who has been designated to perform certain duties relating to the employee disciplinary process in accordance with the procedures in
“Responding Authority” is the TDCJ official who responds to a grievance.
“State Resources,” for the purpose of this directive, includes First class or certified mail postage or overnight delivery service paid or supplied by the state, TDCJ mail service
“Strike” is a work stoppage by a body of workers to enforce compliance with demands made by the body of workers or the workers’ representatives.
“Support Documentation” is all written material submitted to and used by a responding authority in arriving at the findings in an employee grievance case.
“Unit/Department Grievance Contact” is the employee designated by the warden/department head to coordinate the grievance process at the unit/department level.
“Witness” is a person who has
DISCUSSION:
I.Normal