How to Fill Out MSFC Form 4578

MSFC Form 4578 at a glance

What it is: MSFC Form 4578 (March 2013) is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contractor Performance Assessment Review Non-System (Services) CPARS Input Sheet, an evaluation of performance (Source Selection Information).

A filled-in MSFC Form 4578 example: an intermediate evaluation of a services contract

MSFC Form 4578 example filled out, example: an intermediate evaluation of a services contract
An evaluator fills out Form 4578 for a services contract. This intermediate evaluation covers the six months from January 1 to June 30, 2026. The picture shows contract and period, and its names and figures are sample values. The evaluator rates the areas later, so Ratings and narratives, areas A to F stays empty. The contract has no award fee clause, so G. Other Areas stays empty.

How to fill out MSFC Form 4578, box by box

Contract/PO number, contractor, evaluation period, initial, intermediate or final

MSFC Form 4578 example filled out, contract/PO number, contractor, evaluation period, initial, intermediate or final

Enter the CONTRACT/PO NO., the CONTRACTOR and the EVALUATION PERIOD, and mark INITIAL, INTERMEDIATE or FINAL.

Ratings and narratives, areas A to F

MSFC Form 4578 example filled out, ratings and narratives, areas A to F

Evaluate all areas that pertain to the contract under evaluation, unless they are not applicable (N/A).

Enter a Rating 1-5 for A. Quality of Product or Service, B. Schedule, C. Cost Control, D. Business Relations, E. Management of Key Personnel and F. Utilization of Small Business: 1. Unsatisfactory, 2. Marginal, 3. Satisfactory, 4. Very Good, 5. Exceptional or N/A.

A short, factual narrative statement is required for all assessments regardless of rating.

Each narrative statement in support of the area assessment must contain objective data.

A narrative is required for each rated element.

Collect input from entire program/project team.

Document problems and solutions.

Contain nonpersonal and objective statements.

Cost Control is not required for Firm Fixed Price or Firm Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment.

Management of Key Personnel is for Services and Information Technology Business Sectors only, and is not applicable to Operations Support.

Utilization of Small Business: this area must be rated for all contracts and task orders that contain a small business subcontracting goal.

G. Other Areas

MSFC Form 4578 example filled out, g. Other Areas

Specify additional evaluation areas under Other Areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere on the form.

More than one type of entry may be included, but should be separately labeled.

If the contract contains an award fee clause, enter "award fee" in the "Other Areas" Block (18g).

H. Evaluator Statement

MSFC Form 4578 example filled out, h. Evaluator Statement

Check the statement which best applies to the contract evaluation.

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, check one choice that applies to awarding to them today, given that you had a choice. The choices run from would not at one end, then probably would not, might or might not and probably would, to would at the other end.

More rules for MSFC Form 4578

The CPAR is designed to assess prime contractor performance.

When performance has changed from one period to another such that a change in rating results, the narrative must address each change.

Ratings will be in accordance with the definitions listed in this part of the page, with the exception of Section F. Exceptional: performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some, accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions were effective.

Satisfactory: performance meets contractual requirements, and contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: performance does not meet some contractual requirements, the performance has a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions, and the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Sources

[1] MSFC Form 4578 (March 2013), Contractor Performance Assessment Review Non-System (Services) CPARS Input Sheet, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (the Official source link on this page).

Contract Performance Evaluation Template Form PDF Details

The Contract Performance Evaluation Form, as utilized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), represents a critical approach to assessing a contractor's execution against agreed contractual mandates. This comprehensive evaluation tool measures quality of products or services, schedule adherence, and cost control, while also reviewing business relations, key personnel management, and small business utilization.

Key Performance Evaluation Areas

Ratings and Regulatory Framework

Contracting officers provide ratings ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional across each evaluation area. These ratings are stored in the CPARS database and serve as a key reference for future contract awards. The evaluation criteria follow the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.15 and NASA procurement guidelines, ensuring a standardized process. The form also evaluates technical risk management and the effectiveness of proposed corrective actions.

For related performance tools, see the 90-day performance review form and the subcontractor agreement template for comprehensive vendor management.

QuestionAnswer
Form NameContract Performance Evaluation Template Form
Form Length6 pages
Fillable?No
Fillable fields0
Avg. time to fill out1 min 30 sec
Other namescontractor review template, contractor performance evaluation template, contractor performance evaluation template excel, subcontractor performance review template