The DA 7222 form, formally known as the Senior System Civilian Evaluation Report, serves as a critical tool within the framework of the United States Army for assessing the performance and potential of its senior civilian workforce. This comprehensive form, guided by the regulations set forth in AR 690-400 with the support of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) as the proponent agency, encompasses a wide array of elements designed to paint a thorough picture of an employee’s capabilities, achievements, and areas for improvement. The structure of the form allows for a detailed examination, beginning with basic administrative data, which captures essential information such as the employee's name, position, pay grade, and the specific period under review. It further delves into a multifaceted evaluation process involving the direct input of raters and senior raters who provide insights into the individual's performance, adherence to core values, and overall contributions. Additional sections address the potential for performance awards or quality step increases, thereby recognizing outstanding contributions and facilitating career progression. The DA 7222 form embodies a systematic approach to performance management, ensuring that feedback is both structured and objective, fostering an environment of continuous development within the Army's civilian leadership ranks.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Form Da 7222 |
Form Length | 2 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 30 sec |
Other names | da 31 fillable word 2020, da 31 v6 fillable 2018, new da 31 june 2020, new da 31 2020 |
SENIOR SYSTEM CIVILIAN EVALUATION REPORT
For use of this form, see AR
PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b. POSITION TITLE, PAY PLAN, SERIES AND GRADE
c. ORGANIZATION/INSTALLATION |
|
|
d. REASON FOR SUBMISSION |
|
||
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL |
SPECIAL |
INTERN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e. PERIOD COVERED (YYYYMMDD) |
f. RATED MOS. |
|
g. RATEE COPY (Check one and date) |
|
|
FROM |
THRU |
|
GIVEN TO RATEE |
FORWARDED TO RATEE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II - AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
SIGNATURE
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
b. NAME OF INTERMEDIATE RATER (Optional)(Last, First, MI)
SIGNATURE
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
c. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)(If used)
SIGNATURE
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
d.RATEE: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of the Rater and Senior Rater, and merely verifies Part I and Part IV data.
SIGNATURE OF RATEE
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PART III - PERFORMANCE AWARD/QUALITY STEP INCREASE
a. |
|
RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
|
b. ST, SL, GM, GS, WS - PERFORMANCE AWARD/QSI |
|
|||
SES - AWARD, BONUS/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALARY |
PERFORMANCE |
PERCENT OF SALARY ( INCLUDES Locality Pay) |
% (OR) |
|||||
|
RATING |
||||||||
SALARY INCREASE |
AWARD - BONUS |
AMOUNT $ |
|
(OR) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
|
(3) |
QSI (GS with Successful Level 1 Rating Only - minimum of 52 weeks |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
must have elapsed since last QSI) |
|
|
RECOMMENDING OFFICIALS |
|
YES |
NO |
YES |
|
NO |
TO (Grade/Step): |
|
|
RATER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AWARD APPROVED BY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERMEDIATE RATER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE REVIEW BOARD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE (YYYYMMDD) |
FUND CITE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SENIOR RATER |
|
ES |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include as appropriate: people, equipment, facilities, and dollars) . Position Description (DA Form 374) is correct:
YES
NO
PART V - VALUES (Rater)
VALUES |
BULLET COMMENTS |
Loyalty Duty
Respect
S elfless service Honor
I ntegrity
P ersonal courage
DA FORM 7222, MAR 2010 |
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. |
APD PE v1.02ES |
|
PERIOD COVERED (YYYYMMDD) |
RATEE'S NAME |
THRU
PART VI - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Rater)
a. PERFORMANCE DURING THIS RATING PERIOD
Comparison of individual objectives against accomplishments and
Excellence
75% or More Obj
Excellence
Success All or Excellence
Needs Improvement 1 or More Obj
Fails 1 or More Obj
Includes Excellence in Org Mgt/Ldshp OR EEO/AA
Obj for supv/mgr Yes No
b. BULLET EXAMPLES
PART VII - INTERMEDIATE RATER (Optional)
BULLET COMMENTS
PART VIII - SENIOR RATER (if used) or |
|
PART IX - SENIOR RATER (if used) |
RATER (no senior rater used) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING |
BULLET COMMENTS |
(Performance/Potential) |
|
|
}SUCCESSFUL |
|
|
FAIR |
|
|
UNSUCCESSFUL |
|
|
(MUST Have Senior |
A completed DA Form |
|
Rater Review) |
report and considered in my evaluation and review: |
|
|
YES |
NO (Explain) |
REVERSE, DA FORM 7222, MAR 2010 |
APD PE v1.02ES |