In the realm of food safety and manufacturing, specific procedures and documentation are essential to ensure products meet health standards. One critical tool in this process is the FDA Form 3511g, aimed at companies involved in processing low-acid canned foods using cascading or spray water retorts. This form serves as a comprehensive survey for assessing the entire retort system, including the equipment and processing methods. Firms are required to provide detailed information such as the type and specifications of the retort, inspection dates, city, state, and the unique identifier known as the FEI number. The form also demands an in-depth look into the computer control systems utilized by the retort, ensuring they align with regulatory standards, specifically 21 CFR Part 11. Moreover, it examines the retort's agitation capabilities, speed timing, and the water distribution methods employed, emphasizing the need for a validated and well-documented process. Companies must thoroughly address each item, attaching diagrams and complying with standard operating procedures, especially those related to safety measures like OSHA confined space requirements. This meticulous compilation of operational data plays a critical role in guaranteeing the safety and quality of canned foods, thereby protecting public health.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Form Fda 3511G |
Form Length | 11 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 2 min 45 sec |
Other names | OSHA, GPM, LACF, FDA |
Firm Name, City & State: |
FEI Number: |
Inspection Date(s): |
FCE Number: |
Investigators: |
|
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
PROCESSING IN CASCADING/SPRAY WATER RETORTS
(Retort Survey)
INSTRUCTIONS
Complete the question blocks below. Narrative responses to each item can be entered in the item’s “comments” area or where otherwise prompted. Draw a diagram of the retort or obtain one from the firm. Attach the diagram to the EIR as an exhibit. Measure and verify retort plumbing – record on this form. Report all pipe sizes as inside diameter (ID).
Cascading water retorts are covered by 113.40(j). These retorts must meet the requirements found in applicable sections of 113.40. The retorts and operating procedures must be carefully evaluated to ensure that they comply with Part 113.
Some of the questions in this form are designed to capture information useful in evaluation of the retort system and may not indicate a deviation from LACF Regulations, Part 113. The FDA “Guide to Inspections of Low Acid Canned Foods, Part 2,” should be used as a guide when conducting inspections of cascading and spray water retort systems. Photographs are an excellent means of enhancing the description of a retort system.
Before entering the interior of the retort, you must confirm with the firm that you are following the firm’s Stan- dard Operating Procedures designed to meet OSHA confined space requirements. If the firm insists that only plant personnel enter the retort, witness the measurement procedure and data collection. To obtain OSHA con- fined space information and safety procedures, see the confined space presentation on the FDA ORAU web site. If the firm is not aware of the OSHA confined space requirements or does not have a confined space program,
DO NOT ENTER THE RETORT.
If problems are found with the firm’s retort equipment or processing system, refer the reader to the Turbo EIR for a narrative description of specific problems with supporting evidence, under “Objectionable Conditions and Management’s Response.” Submit the completed form as an EIR attachment.
RETORT DESCRIPTION
RETORT NO.
TYPE OF RETORT
Vertical Horizontal Other
LENGTH OR HEIGHT
DIAMETER
RETORT MANUFACTURER:
RETORT MODEL:
TEMPERATURE RANGE OF THERMAL PROCESS (E.G., 245/250/260 DEGREES F):
NUMBER OF BASKETS OR CRATES PER RETORT:
PROCESSING MODE |
Static Still |
COMMENTS: |
|
Agitating
Rocking
COMPUTER CONTROLS
DOES A COMPUTER CONTROL ANY OF THE RETORT FUNCTIONS? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 1 of 11 |
PSC Publishing Services (301) |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
DOES THE FIRM HAVE DOCUMENTATION ON HAND WHICH INDICATES THAT THE COMPUTER SYSTEM HAS BEEN VALIDATED?
EXPLAIN:
No
IS RECORD KEEPING PART OF THE COMPUTER FUNCTION? |
Yes |
IF YES, DOES THE RECORD KEEPING COMPLY WITH 21 CFR PART 11? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
No
AGITATION
IS THE AGITATING RETORT OPERATED IN THE STILL MODE? |
Yes |
HAVE PROCESS ESTABLISHMENT TESTS DETERMINED THAT RETORT CRATE POSITION |
|
IS CRITICAL TO THE |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
No
WAS THE RECOMMENDED CRATE POSITION BEING USED DURING THE INSPECTION? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
HOW DOES THE FIRM DETERMINE CRATE POSITION?
RETORT SPEED TIMING (113.40(e)(5))
IS THE ROTATIONAL SPEED OF THE RETORT SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULED PROCESS? |
Yes |
(SHALL REQUIREMENT)
COMMENTS:
No
IS THE ROTATIONAL SPEED OF THE RETORT ADJUSTED, AS NECESSARY, TO ENSURE |
|
THAT THE SPEED IS AS SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULED PROCESS? |
Yes |
(SHALL REQUIREMENT) |
|
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS THE ROTATIONAL SPEED OF THE RETORT AND THE PROCESS TIME RECORDED FOR EACH RETORT LOAD PROCESSED?
Process Time |
Yes |
No |
|
Rotational Speed |
Yes |
No |
|
(SHALL REQUIREMENT) |
|
|
|
IF NO, IS A RECORDING TACHOMETER USED TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS RECORD OF THE SPEED? |
Yes |
||
(SHALL REQUIREMENT) |
|
|
|
No
IF NO TO THE ABOVE 2 QUESTIONS, DOES THE FIRM MONITOR AND RECORD THE |
|
RETORT SPEED AND PROCESS TIME OF EACH RETORT LOAD PROCESSED? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 2 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
DOES THE FIRM HAVE A MEANS OF PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED SPEED CHANGES ON THE RETORT?
(SHALL REQUIREMENT – A LOCK OR NOTICE FROM MANAGEMENT, POSTED AT OR NEAR THE SPEED ADJUSTMENT DEVICE THAT PROVIDES A WARNING THAT ONLY AUTHORIZED PERSONS ARE PERMITTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS, IS A SATISFACTORY MEANS OF PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES.)
COMMENTS:
PROCESSING WATER
METHOD USED TO HEAT PROCESS WATER:
A. Steam Injection into Process Water |
B. Heat Exchanger |
IF OTHER, EXPLAIN:
C. Steam Spreader
D. Other
WATER DRAINS
ARE SCREENS USED OVER ALL DRAIN OPENINGS TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF DRAINS? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS THE DRAIN LINE VALVE WATER TIGHT AND |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
WATER DISTRIBUTION
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: |
|
Manifold Plate? |
Yes |
Spray Nozzle Heads? |
Yes |
Manifold Pipe? |
Yes |
Other? |
Yes |
IF OTHER, EXPLAIN: |
|
No
No
No
No
DESCRIBE HOLE SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION IN MANIFOLD/SPRAY NOZZLES:
HAVE HOLE SIZES BEEN ALTERED BY PRODUCT OR MINERAL |
Yes |
IF YES, DESCRIBE: |
|
No
DOES FIRM HAVE A CLEANING PROGRAM FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM? |
Yes |
DESCRIBE: |
|
No
HOW DOES THE FIRM ENSURE THAT WATER FLOW IS CONSTANT?
A... |
Visual Checks |
Yes |
B... |
Water Flow Measurement |
Yes |
C... |
Flow Meter |
Yes |
No
No
No
HOW OFTEN IS WATER FLOW CHECKED?
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 3 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
WHAT IS THE WATER FLOW RATE?
DESCRIBE THE PROCEDURE TO ENSURE WATER FLOW IS MAINTAINED:
PROVIDE THE WATER FLOW METER, MODEL NUMBER AND LOCATION:
AT WHAT POINT DOES WATER ENTER THE RETORT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM?
Back Top |
Yes |
No |
Back Bottom |
Yes |
No |
Front Top |
Yes |
No |
Front Bottom |
Yes |
No |
Center |
Yes |
No |
Multiple |
Yes |
No |
EXPLAIN WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: |
|
|
DESCRIBE WATER RETURN SYSTEM:
ARE WATER RETURN INLETS SCREENED? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS THE PROCESSING WATER REUSED? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IF WATER IS REUSED DURING THERMAL PROCESSING, WHAT IS THE RECIRCULATION RATE?
WHAT IS THE CAPACITY OF THE WATER PUMP (GPM/LPM)?
IS WATER FLOW IDENTIFIED AND CONTROLLED AS A FACTOR CRITICAL TO THE THERMAL PROCESS?........ Yes
COMMENTS:
No
ARE WATER FLOW PROBLEMS HANDLED AS PROCESS DEVIATIONS? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
DURING THE INSPECTION, WAS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF LOW WATER FLOW? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
COOLING WATER SUPPLY
IS PROCESSING WATER USED TO COOL CONTAINERS DURING THE COOLING CYCLE? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN HOW COOLING WATER IS INTRODUCED INTO THE SYSTEM: |
|
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 4 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
IF WATER IS INTRODUCED FROM AN EXTERIOR SOURCE DURING COOLING, IS THE WATER COOLING |
|
LINE EQUIPPED WITH A CHECK VALVE? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
MIG THERMOMETER/TEMPERATURE INDICATOR
IS THE RETORT EQUIPPED WITH A |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS A MIG THERMOMETER USED AS THE REFERENCE INSTRUMENT DURING PROCESSING?............................. Yes
COMMENTS:
No
IS THE RETORT EQUIPPED WITH ANOTHER TYPE OF TEMPERATURE INDICATOR DEVICE? ............................. Yes
IF SO, DESCRIBE THE INDICATOR:
No
ARE TEMPERATURE INDICATOR SCALE DIVISIONS EASILY READABLE TO 1°F (.5°C)? |
Yes |
No |
||
NO. OF DEGREES F OR C/IN. OF GRADUATED SCALE: |
|
. (TEMP. RANGE MUST NOT EXCEED 17°F PER INCH |
||
(4°C PER CM) OF GRADUATED SCALE – 113.40(a)(1). ALSO, SEE LACF GUIDE , P. 14.) |
|
|
COMMENTS:
DATE TEMPERATURE INDICATOR/MIG LAST TESTED FOR ACCURACY:
(THERMOMETERS SHALL BE TESTED FOR ACCURACY AGAINST A KNOWN ACCURATE STANDARD THERMOMETER UPON INSTALLATION AND AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR THEREAFTER; RECORDS OF ACCURACY CHECKS THAT SPECIFY DATE, STANDARD USED, METHOD USED AND PERSON PERFORMING THE TEST SHOULD BE MAINTAINED. EACH THERMOMETER SHOULD HAVE A TAG, SEAL OR OTHER MEANS OF IDENTITY THAT INCLUDES THE DATE IT WAS LAST TESTED FOR ACCURACY – 113.40(a)(1).)
STANDARD USED FOR THE TEST:
NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON WHO PERFORMED TEST:
IS THE LAST TEST DATE IDENTIFIED ON THE MIG THERMOMETER/TEMPERATURE INDICATOR? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
DESCRIBE THE FIRM’S ACTIONS REGARDING MIG THERMOMETERS/TEMPERATURE INDICATORS THAT WERE OUT OF CALIBRATION:
IS THE MIG THERMOMETER MERCURY UNDIVIDED? |
Yes |
(A THERMOMETER THAT HAS A DIVIDED MERCURY COLUMN OR THAT CANNOT BE ADJUSTED TO THE STANDARD SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED, 113.40(a)(1).)
COMMENTS:
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 5 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
WHEN MIG THERMOMETERS/TEMPERATURE INDICATORS ARE FOUND TO BE PROVIDING |
|
READINGS ABOVE THE ACTUAL PROCESSING TEMPERATURES, DOES THE FIRM EVALUATE |
|
PRODUCTS PRODUCED USING THOSE THERMOMETERS? |
Yes |
DESCRIBE THE FIRM’S PROCEDURES: |
|
No
IS THE THERMOMETER/TEMPERATURE INDICATOR LOCATED WHERE IT IS EASY TO READ ACCURATELY? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
THE INDICATOR SENSOR BULB IS LOCATED IN THE SYSTEM
Retort Shell
External Well
After the Heat Exchanger
Before the Heat Exchanger
DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE INDICATOR SENSOR. HOW DOES THE FIRM ENSURE THAT THE TEMPERATURE INDICATED IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROCESSING TEMPERATURE?
TEMPERATURE RECORDER
TYPE OF TEMPERATURE RECORDER |
Round Circular Chart |
COMMENTS:
Strip Chart
Other
DO THE CHART SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 113? |
Yes |
No
(GRADUATIONS ON THE TEMPERATURE RECORDING DEVICE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2°F (1°C) WITHIN A RANGE OF 10°F (5.5°C) OF THE PROCESSING TEMPERATURE. EACH CHART SHALL HAVE A WORKING SCALE OF NOT MORE THAN 55°F/IN. (12°C/CM) WITHIN A RANGE OF 20°F (10°C) OF THE PROCESSING TEMPERATURE – 113.40(b)(2). ALSO, SEE P. 14 OF LACF GUIDE, PART 2.)
COMMENTS:
IS THE TEMPERATURE CHART ADJUSTED TO AGREE AS NEARLY AS POSSIBLE WITH BUT NOT HIGHER THAN |
Yes |
THE KNOWN ACCURATE |
|
(SHALL REQUIREMENT – 113.40(b)(2). NOTE ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RECORDING THERMOMETER AND THE MIG/
INDICATING THERMOMETER AND WHICH READING IS HIGHER.)
COMMENTS:
No
IS THERE A MEANS OF PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED ADJUSTMENTS? |
Yes |
No
(A MEANS OF PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES IN ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. A LOCK OR NOTICE FROM MANAGEMENT STATING “ONLY AUTHORIZED PERSONS ARE PERMITTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS,” POSTED AT OR NEAR THE RECORDING DEVICE, IS A SATISFACTORY MEANS OF PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES – 113.40(b)(2).)
COMMENTS:
IS THE CHART DRIVE TIMING MECHANISM ACCURATE? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS THE RECORDER COMBINED WITH A STEAM CONTROLLER? |
Yes |
............................................................................. |
|
COMMENTS: |
|
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 6 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
THE TEMPERATURE RECORDER SENSING BULB IS INSTALLED IN THE
Retort Shell
EXPLAIN:
External Well |
After the Heat Exchanger |
Before the Heat Exchanger |
TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER
HOW IS TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED IN THE RETORT?
Recorder Controller
EXPLAIN:
CAM Controller |
Manual Switching |
Computer
Other
WHERE IS THE CONTROLLER SENSOR LOCATED?
Retort Shell
EXPLAIN:
External Well |
After the Heat Exchanger |
Before the Heat Exchanger |
REPORT THE MANUFACTURER, MODEL, TYPE AND SIZE OF THE AUTOMATIC STEAM CONTROL VALVE:
IF THE TEMPERATURE (STEAM) CONTROLLER IS AIR OPERATED, DOES THE SYSTEM HAVE |
|
AN ADEQUATE FILTER TO ASSURE A SUPPLY OF CLEAN, DRY AIR? |
Yes |
No
(AIR OPERATED TEMPERATURE CONTROLLERS SHOULD HAVE ADEQUATE FILTER SYSTEMS TO ASSURE A SUPPLY OF CLEAN, DRY AIR – 113.40(a)(2).)
COMMENTS:
DURING THE INSPECTION, WAS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF TEMPERATURE DROPS? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN:
No
DESCRIBE THE FIRM’S PROCEDURE TO BRING THE RETORT UP TO PROCESSING TEMPERATURE. INCLUDE TIME, TEMPERATURE AND NUMBER OF STEPS:
CAN THE FIRM DOCUMENT ALL STEPS OF THE |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
DOES THE FIRM IDENTIFY PROCESS
No
(NOTE – PROCESSING STEPS ARE REQUIRED ON THE PROCESS FILING FORM WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CRITICAL TO THE THERMAL PROCESS. THIS IS ALWAYS THE CASE WHEN THE GENERAL METHOD IS USED TO CALCULATE THE FO.)
COMMENTS:
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 7 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
RETORT PLUMBING AND EQUIPMENT ISSUES
WHEN WAS THE LAST MAJOR OVERHAUL OR MAINTENANCE PERFORMED ON THE RETORTS?
COMMENTS:
DOES THE FIRM CONDUCT A RETORT SURVEY PERIODICALLY (YEARLY), OR AFTER A MAJOR RETORT |
|
OVERHAUL OR AFTER MAINTENANCE IS PERFORMED ON CRITICAL EQUIPMENT (RETORTS, FILLER, |
|
BOILER CONFIGURATION, ETC.)? |
Yes |
No
A RETORT SURVEY IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE REGULATIONS, BUT IS COMMONLY USED TO DOCUMENT THAT A FIRM’S PROCESSING SYSTEM IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FDA REGULATIONS AND THAT THE SYSTEM MEETS THE SAME CRITERIA (VALVE TYPE, STEAM SPREADER CONFIGURATION, ETC.) AS WHEN TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES WERE CONDUCTED.
COMMENTS:
DO THE BOILERS SUPPLY SUFFICIENT STEAM TO THE RETORTS? |
Yes |
IS THERE SUFFICIENT PRESSURE IN THE HEADER PIPE SUPPLYING STEAM TO THE RETORTS, |
|
ESPECIALLY WHEN MORE THAN ONE RETORT IS BEING VENTED SIMULTANEOUSLY? |
Yes |
No
No
COMMENTS:
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION
HAVE TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES BEEN PERFORMED ON THE FIRM’S RETORTS? |
Yes |
IF SO, WHO CONDUCTED THE STUDY, WHAT PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED AND WHO EVALUATED THE DATA?
IS THERE DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS A RETORT DIAGRAM AND PARAMETERS |
|
USED TO VALIDATE THE TESTS? |
Yes |
No
No
(FOR AN EXPLANATION OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION, SEE P. 21 OF LACF GUIDE, PART 2. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONDUCTING TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES IN
COMMENTS:
DATE OF LAST TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY:
HAS A TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY BEEN PERFORMED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL RETORT? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
HAS A TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY BEEN PERFORMED ON EACH CONTAINER SIZE? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
HAS A TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY BEEN PERFORMED ON EACH |
Yes |
CONTAINER TYPE (E.G., GLASS, METAL, PLASTIC)? |
|
COMMENTS: |
|
No
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 8 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
HAS A TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY BEEN PERFORMED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL |
|
PRODUCT OR PRODUCT TYPE (E.G., SEAFOOD SOUP VERSUS CANNED TUNA)? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
DID EACH TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY IDENTIFY A COLD SPOT IN THE RETORT? |
Yes |
PROVIDE LOCATION AND EXPLAIN: |
|
No
HAVE TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES BEEN PERFORMED TO DETERMINE |
|
THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE DROPS DURING |
Yes |
REPORT RESULTS: |
|
No
HAVE TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES BEEN PERFORMED TO DETERMINE |
|
THE EFFECTS OF LOW WATER FLOW? |
Yes |
REPORT RESULTS: |
|
No
ARE PARTIAL LOADS PROCESSED IN THE FIRM’S RETORTS? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
ARE BAFFLE PLATES OR DUMMY LOADS USED DURING THE PROCESSING OF PARTIAL LOADS? |
Yes |
EXPLAIN: |
|
No
HAVE TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDIES BEEN PERFORMED WITH PARTIAL LOADS? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES TO THE RETORTS OR THERMAL PROCESSING SYSTEM SINCE THE |
|
LAST TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION STUDY THAT COULD AFFECT TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION? |
Yes |
No
(THE RETORT DESIGN, LOADING CONFIGURATION, SMALLEST CONTAINER SIZE AND MANY OTHER FACTORS CAN AFFECT THE ATTAINMENT OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN THE RETORT – SEE PP.
IF A CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE IN THE THERMAL PROCESSING SYSTEM THAT COULD AFFECT TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION, THE FIRM SHOULD HAVE ON FILE DOCUMENTATION OF THE CHANGE, INCLUDING THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY A QUALIFIED PROCESS AUTHORITY.)
COMMENTS
RETORT CRATES AND RACKS
DESCRIBE THE RETORT CRATES.
DIMENSIONS:
NUMBER OF HOLES:
SIZE OF HOLES:
LOCATION OF HOLES:
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 9 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
ARE CONTAINERS POSITIONED IN THE RETORT AS SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULED PROCESS? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
ARE DIVIDERS, TRAYS, RACKS OR OTHER MEANS OF POSITIONING FLEXIBLE CONTAINERS DESIGNED
AND EMPLOYED TO ENSURE EVEN CIRCULATION OF HEATING MEDIUM AROUND ALL CONTAINERS? ........... Yes
COMMENTS:
No
ARE DIVIDER PLATES USED? |
Yes |
......................................................................................................................................... |
|
DESCRIBE THE NUMBER OF HOLES AND DISTRIBUTION IN DIVIDER PLATES: |
|
No
IS THE SAME TYPE OF DIVIDER PLATE USED FOR ALL CONTAINERS? |
Yes |
DESCRIBE DIFFERENCES: |
|
No
ARE CONTAINERS PROCESSED WITHOUT DIVIDER PLATES? |
Yes |
DESCRIBE STACKING ARRANGEMENT (E.G., BRICK, OFFSET, JUMBLE): |
|
No
IS CONTAINER NESTING POSSIBLE? |
Yes |
HOW DOES FIRM CONTROL NESTING OF CONTAINERS? |
|
No
WAS CONTAINER NESTING EVALUATED AS PART OF THE PROCESS ESTABLISHMENT? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
DOES THE FIRM PROCESS? |
|
Metal Cans |
Yes |
Glass Jars |
Yes |
Pouches |
Yes |
Rigid Plastic |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No No
No No
DOES THE FIRM PROCESS MORE THAN ONE CONTAINER SIZE? |
Yes |
LIST ALL CONTAINER SIZES: |
|
METAL CANS – |
|
GLASS JARS – |
|
POUCHES – |
|
RIGID PLASTIC – |
|
No
IF MORE THAN ONE CONTAINER SIZE OR TYPE IS PROCESSED AT ONE TIME, DESCRIBE PROCEDURE USED:
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 10 of 11 |
Firm Name: |
FEI Number: |
|
|
FOR POUCHES, ARE TRAYS ADEQUATELY DESIGNED WITH POCKETS TO CONTAIN |
|
AND RESTRAIN INDIVIDUAL POUCHES DURING PROCESSING? |
Yes |
............................................................................... |
|
COMMENTS: |
|
No
ARE TRAYS OR DIVIDER PLATES IN GOOD CONDITION WITH NO SHARP OR ROUGH POINTS THAT COULD PUNCTURE CONTAINERS?
COMMENTS:
No
PRESSURE CONTROL
ARE PRODUCTS PRODUCED USING |
Yes |
............................................................................................ |
|
LIST THE |
|
No
IS THE RETORT EQUIPPED WITH A PRESSURE GAGE? |
Yes |
............................................................................................. |
COMMENTS:
No
DESCRIBE THE LOCATION WHERE COMPRESSED AIR ENTERS THE RETORT:
IS THE COMPRESSED AIR USED FOR |
|
TO INTRODUCTION INTO THE RETORT? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
IS A DIFFUSER USED ON THE COMPRESSED AIR ENTRY LINE TO ENSURE RAPID MIXING |
|
OF THE AIR IN THE RETORT ATMOSPHERE? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
HAS THE POINT WHERE AIR ENTERS THE RETORT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS A COLD SPOT IN THE RETORT? |
Yes |
COMMENTS: |
|
No
EXPLAIN HOW PRESSURE IS CONTROLLED IN THE RETORT:
HAS |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
ARE PRESSURE DROPS CONSIDERED TO BE PROCESS DEVIATIONS? |
Yes |
COMMENTS:
No
OTHER CONCERNS AND OBSERVATIONS
PLEASE EXPLAIN OTHER CONCERNS NOTED REGARDING THERMAL PROCESSING IN THIS FIRM:
FORM FDA 3511g (1/11) |
PAGE 11 of 11 |