Ics 225 Cg Form PDF Details

In the realm of incident management, effective performance evaluation is crucial for enhancing the capabilities and readiness of personnel. The ICS 225-CG form serves this exact purpose by offering a structured platform for supervisors to assess their subordinates' performance during specific incidents or events. This comprehensive tool focuses on a wide range of evaluation criteria, such as professional competence, adaptability, communication skills, leadership, teamwork, judgment under stress, initiative, and adherence to safety protocols. Preparing this form involves the supervisor meticulously rating each aspect of the subordinate's job performance, thereby identifying areas of excellence as well as those requiring improvement. Following the evaluation, it is discussed with the evaluated individual, who then signs off on the assessment, underscoring the form's role in promoting transparency and constructive feedback. Moreover, the form includes sections for the evaluator and the subordinate to provide their signatures, ensuring accountability and mutual understanding of the performance review. Distributed within the planning section before the evaluator departs from the incident site, the ICS 225-CG form is an essential document for continuous improvement and professional development within the incident command system.

QuestionAnswer
Form NameIcs 225 Cg Form
Form Length2 pages
Fillable?No
Fillable fields0
Avg. time to fill out30 sec
Other namestimeliness, rater, ics form 225 fillable 2016, ICS

Form Preview Example

 

 

Reset Form

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCIDENT PERSONNEL

INSTRUCTIONS: The immediate job supervisor will prepare this form for each subordinate. It will be delivered to

PERFORMANCE RATING

the planning section before the rater leaves the incident. Rating will be reviewed with the subordinate who will sign

ICS 225-CG

at the bottom. To electronically fill form, double-click on first word of each section, then enter information.

 

 

 

THIS RATING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR DETERMINING AN INDIVIDUAL’S PERFORMANCE ON AN INCIDENT/EVENT

 

1. Name:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Incident Name:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Home Unit and Phone Number:

 

 

 

 

 

4. Location of Incident:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Position Assigned:

 

 

6. Date of Assignment:

 

 

 

 

7. Date Incident

8. Incident

 

9. Incident Kind:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Started:

Type:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From:

To:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. Evaluation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating Factors

N/A

 

1 - Unacceptable

 

2

 

3 – Met Standards

 

4

 

5 – Exceeded Expectations

 

A. Knowledge of the job/

 

Questionable competence and credibility.

 

 

Competent and credible authority on specialty or

 

Superior expertise; advice and actions showed

 

Professional Competence &

 

Operational or specialty expertise inadequate or

 

operational issues.

 

 

great breadth and depth of knowledge.

 

Using ICS:

 

lacking in key areas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. Planning/Preparedness

 

Got caught by the unexpected; appeared to be

 

Consistently prepared. Set high but realistic

 

 

Exceptional preparation. Always looked beyond

 

& ability to obtain

 

controlled by events; routine tasks accomplished

 

goals. Work was timely and of high quality;

 

 

immediate events or problems. Maintained

 

performance/results:

 

with difficulty.

 

 

required same of subordinates.

 

 

optimal balance among quality, quantity, and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

timeliness of work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. Adaptability/Attitude:

 

Unable to gauge effectiveness of work,

 

 

Receptive to change, new information, and

 

 

Rapidly assessed and confidently adjusted to

 

 

 

recognize political realities, or make adjustments

 

technology.

 

 

changing conditions, political realities, new

 

 

 

when needed. Maintained a poor outlook.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

information and technology.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D. Communication Skills:

 

Unable to effectively articulate ideas and facts;

 

Effectively expressed ideas and facts in

 

 

Clearly articulated and promoted ideas. Adept at

 

 

 

lacked preparation, confidence, or logic.

 

 

individual and group situations; non-verbal

 

 

presenting complex or sensitive issues.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

actions consistent with spoken message.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E. Directing Others:

 

Showed difficulty in directing or influencing

 

 

Set high work standards; clearly articulated job

 

 

An inspirational leader who motivated others to

 

 

 

others. Unwilling to delegate authority to

 

 

requirements, expectations and measurement

 

 

achieve results not normally attainable. Modified

 

 

 

increase efficiency of task accomplishment.

 

 

criteria; held subordinates accountable.

 

 

leadership styles to best meet situations. Won

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

people over rather than imposing will.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F. Ability to work on/

 

Ignorance of individuals’ capabilities increased

 

Skillfully used teams to increase unit

 

 

Insightful use of teams raised unit productivity

 

Consideration for team:

 

chance of failure. Seldom recognized or

 

 

effectiveness, quality, and service. Cared for

 

 

beyond expectations. Inspired high level of esprit

 

 

 

rewarded deserving subordinates or others.

 

 

people. Recognized and responded to their

 

 

de corps, even in difficult situations. Ensured

 

 

 

Used teams ineffectively or at wrong times.

 

 

needs

 

 

appropriate and timely recognition of others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G. Judgment/Decisions

 

Decisions often displayed poor analysis. Failed

 

Skillfully used teams to increase unit

 

 

Combined keen analytical thought and insight to

 

under stress:

 

to make necessary decisions, or jumped to

 

 

effectiveness, quality, and service.

 

 

make appropriate decisions. Focused on the key

 

 

 

conclusions without considering facts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

issues and the most relevant information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H. Initiative

 

Postponed needed action. Implemented or

 

 

Championed improvement through new ideas,

 

 

Aggressively sought out additional responsibility.

 

 

 

supported improvements only when directed.

 

methods, and practices; self-starter.

 

 

A self-learner. Optimized use of new ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. Adherence to safety:

 

Failed to adequately identify and protect

 

 

Ensured that safe operating procedures were

 

 

Demonstrated a significant commitment towards

 

 

 

personnel from safety hazards.

 

 

followed.

 

 

safety of personnel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11. Remarks/Potential: Type remarks here; Describe ability to assume greater leadership roles and responsibilities (e.g., rate performance, recommend incident management positions and/or ICS or other training).

 

12.

Rated Person (signature) This rating has been discussed with me.

 

13 Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.

Rated By (signature/print name):

15. Supervisor Home Unit (address/phone):

16. Supervisor Position:

 

17. Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incident Personnel Performance Rating

Page 1

ICS 225-CG (Rev 05/10)

INCIDENT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE RATING (ICS 225-CG) – Rev 9/06

Purpose. The Incident Personnel Performance Rating gives supervisors the opportunity to evaluate subordinates on incident assignments. THIS RATING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR DETERMINING AN INDIVIDUAL’S PERFORMANCE ON AN INCIDENT/EVENT.

Preparation. The Incident Personnel Performance Rating is normally prepared by the supervisor for each subordinate, using the evaluation standard given in the form. It will be delivered to the planning section before the rater leaves the incident. Rating will be reviewed with the subordinate who will sign at the bottom.

Distribution. The Incident Personnel Performance Rating is duplicated a copy is given to the subordinate and supervisor. All completed original forms MUST be given to the Documentation Unit.

Item #

Item Title

Instructions

1.

Name

Enter the name of the person being evaluated.

2.

Incident Name

Enter the name assigned to the incident.

3.

Home Unit

Enter the address and phone number of the home unit of the person being evaluated.

4.

Location of Incident

Enter the address/location of the incident.

5.

Position Assigned

Enter the position assigned for the purpose of this evaluation.

6.

Date of Assignment

Enter the date of assignment.

7.

Date Incident Started

Enter the date the incident started.

8.

Type of Incident

Enter the Type (size) of the incident: Type 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5.

9.

Kind of Incident

Enter the kind of incident: Oil/Hazmat Spill, SAR, Fire, etc.

10.

Evaluation

Enter X under the appropriate rating for each category listed using the definitions

 

 

 

given.

 

Not Applicable

not observed.

 

1

- Unacceptable

Deficient. Does not meet minimum requirements of the individual element.

 

 

 

DEFICIENCIES/IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED MUST BE IDENTIFIED IN REMARKS.

 

2

- Needs to improve

Meets some or most of the requirements of the individual element. IDENTIFY

 

 

 

IMPROVEMENT NEEDED IN REMARKS.

 

3

- Met Standards

Satisfactory. Employee meets all requirements of the individual element.

 

4

- Fully successful

Employee meets all requirements and exceeds one or several of the requirements of

 

 

 

the individual element.

 

5

- Exceeded

Superior. Employee consistently exceeds the performance requirements.

 

Expectations

 

11.

Remarks

Provide remarks/comments for ratings given. Comments required for

 

 

 

unsatisfactory and needs to improve ratings.

12.Rated Person Signature Rated Person’s signature.

13.

Date

Enter date (month, day, year) rated person signed performance rating.

14.

Rated By

Signature and printed name of supervisor/person giving the performance rating.

15.

Supervisor Home Unit

Enter address/phone of supervisor.

16.

Supervisor Position

Enter the position the supervisor held.

17.

Date

Enter date (month, day, year) supervisor signed the performance rating.

Incident Personnel Performance Rating

Page 2

ICS 225-CG (Rev 05/10)

How to Edit Ics 225 Cg Form Online for Free

Whenever you wish to fill out rater, there's no need to download any programs - just try using our PDF tool. Our team is ceaselessly endeavoring to improve the tool and make it even easier for clients with its extensive features. Make the most of present-day progressive opportunities, and discover a myriad of emerging experiences! All it takes is just a few basic steps:

Step 1: Access the PDF file in our editor by pressing the "Get Form Button" in the top part of this page.

Step 2: When you start the tool, there'll be the form all set to be completed. Besides filling out different blank fields, you could also do other sorts of actions with the form, specifically adding custom words, modifying the initial textual content, adding graphics, placing your signature to the document, and a lot more.

When it comes to fields of this specific form, here's what you should know:

1. To start with, once filling out the rater, beging with the part that has the next blank fields:

The way to complete ICS portion 1

2. After finishing the last part, go to the next stage and enter all required particulars in these blanks - F Ability to work on Consideration, G JudgmentDecisions under stress, H Initiative, I Adherence to safety, Showed difficulty in directing or, Ignorance of individuals, Decisions often displayed poor, Postponed needed action, Failed to adequately identify and, Set high work standards clearly, Skillfully used teams to increase, Skillfully used teams to increase, Championed improvement through new, Ensured that safe operating, and An inspirational leader who.

Part no. 2 for filling in ICS

Concerning F Ability to work on Consideration and G JudgmentDecisions under stress, ensure you take another look in this current part. Both these are considered the key ones in the file.

Step 3: Make sure that the information is accurate and then press "Done" to complete the project. Obtain the rater as soon as you sign up for a 7-day free trial. Readily gain access to the pdf from your personal account page, together with any modifications and changes being conveniently kept! FormsPal guarantees your data privacy with a protected system that never records or distributes any type of private data provided. You can relax knowing your docs are kept protected any time you use our tools!