Da 11 2 Fillable Form – Fill Out and Use This PDF

Updated: Nov 9, 2026

The DA Form 11-2, known as the Internal Control Evaluation Certification, serves a critical role in the framework of the Army Managers' Internal Control Program, as outlined in AR 11-2. Employed by the Department of the Army, this form enables the systematic evaluation of key internal controls within any given assessable unit, documenting methods of evaluation, findings, and corrective actions taken. Emphasizing the importance of accountability and efficiency, the form acts as both a tool for assessment and a record for future audits. Ensure the integrity of your unit’s internal controls by completing and certifying the DA Form 11-2 today, simply by clicking the button below.

Get Form Now Download PDF

How to Fill Out DA Form 11-2

DA Form 11-2 at a glance

What it is: DA Form 11-2 is the Internal Control Evaluation Certification.

Who signs: Under a. Assessable Unit Manager, enter (1) Typed Name and Title, then sign (2) Signature, and enter b. Date Certified.

A filled-in DA Form 11-2 example: a manager certifies a checklist evaluation

DA Form 11-2 example filled out, example: a manager certifies a checklist evaluation — Maria L. Sample, an assessable unit manager, completes DA Form 11-2. She uses a checklist and tests two ways, sampling and review of files, so Alternative Method stays empty. The picture shows page 1 only, and none of its entries is real.

How to fill out DA Form 11-2, box by box

Regulation, unit and function

Enter the Regulation Number in Box 1 and the Date of Regulation in Box 2.

Enter the Assessable Unit in Box 3 and the Function in Box 4.

Method of evaluation

In Box 5, Method of Evaluation, check all that apply: a. Checklist or b. Alternative Method (Indicate method).

For a Checklist, enter the appropriate letter under Appendix.

Evaluation conducted by

In Box 6, Evaluation Conducted By, enter the Name (Last, First, MI) and the Date of Evaluation.

Remarks and method of testing key controls

In Box 7, Remarks (See Attached), describe the method used to test key controls, the internal control weakness(es) detected by the evaluation (if any) and the corrective action(s) taken. This is mandatory.

For the Method of Testing Key Controls, check all that apply: Direct Observation, Analysis, Sampling, Simulation, Review of Files or Other Documentation, Interviews or Other (Explain).

For Evaluation Results, include specific items tested.

For Internal Control Deficiencies Detected, if any, include potential material weaknesses.

Describe corrective actions taken, if applicable.

Certification and signing

In Box 8, Certification: by signing, you certify that the key internal controls in this function have been evaluated in accordance with provisions of AR 11-2, Army Managers' Internal Control Program. You also certify that corrective action has been initiated to resolve any deficiencies detected. This certification statement and any supporting documentation will be retained on file subject to audit/inspection until superseded by a subsequent internal control evaluation.

Under a. Assessable Unit Manager, enter (1) Typed Name and Title, then sign (2) Signature, and enter b. Date Certified.

More rules for DA Form 11-2

For use of this form, see AR 11-2; the proponent agency is ASA(FM&C).

Sources

[1] DA Form 11-2 (SEP 2012), Internal Control Evaluation Certification, U.S. Army (the Official source link on this page).

Da 11 2 Fillable Form PDF Details

The DA Form 11-2 is the Internal Control Evaluation Certification used throughout the United States Army. It is required under Army Regulation 11-2 and operates under the authority of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Financial Management and Comptroller (ASA(FM&C)). Assessable unit managers complete this form each evaluation cycle to certify that internal controls within their unit have been reviewed and meet the standards established by the Army Managers' Internal Control Program.

Scope and Evaluation Methods

The form covers a broad range of processes within any assessable unit. Each entry identifies the applicable regulation number, the evaluation period, and the specific functions under review. Evaluators document their assessment methodology for each area. Accepted methods include direct observation of operations, reviews of physical and electronic files, quantitative and qualitative analyses, random sampling of transactions, simulation exercises, structured interviews with personnel, and other documented evaluation approaches. Each method must be clearly identified in the evaluation results section so reviewers can assess the thoroughness of the certification.

Documenting Deficiencies and Corrective Actions

When the evaluation uncovers weaknesses, the DA Form 11-2 requires a full written record of each identified deficiency. The form captures the nature of the weakness, its potential impact on the unit's financial management or operational effectiveness, and the specific corrective steps planned or already completed. This documentation creates a traceable record for future audits and supports the Army's emphasis on continuous improvement and accountability. Evaluators must also note the name and position of the action officer responsible for each corrective measure and the projected completion date.

Certification and Retention

The final section of the form requires the assessable unit manager's typed name, job title, handwritten signature, and the date of certification. This signature confirms that the evaluation was conducted in accordance with AR 11-2 requirements and that all identified control deficiencies are being addressed through documented corrective actions. Completed forms are retained per the retention schedules established in AR 11-2 and remain available for inspection during subsequent program reviews or audits.

Question	Answer
Form Name	Da 11 2 Fillable Form
Form Length	4 pages
Fillable?	No
Fillable fields	0
Avg. time to fill out	1 min
Other names	form, FMC, ASA, 00ES