The Evaluation For Business form is an essential tool designed to provide a comprehensive review of oral presentations for business plans. This tool meticulously assesses the effectiveness of the presentation style, the coherence and completeness of the business plan summary, and the potential viability of the venture as presented by the team. Evaluators are guided to rate various aspects of the presentation and business plan on a scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent), with criteria including clarity, conciseness, logical sequencing, and the ability to capture and maintain the interest of judges or potential investors. Presentation style is emphasized, accounting for 35% of the total evaluation, and includes assessment of the presenter's confidence, professionalism, and knowledge of the industry. Similarly, the business plan summary, also comprising 35% of the evaluation, focuses on the clarity with which the product or service is described, marketability, company operations, identified risks, and financial forecasts. Finally, the evaluation scrutinizes the team and venture viability, which is valued at 30%, based on the leadership, skills, and the entrepreneurial team's synergy and potential for success. This rigorous evaluation process not only gauges immediate presentation effectiveness but also the long-term viability and operational soundness of the proposed business venture.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Form Name | Evaluation Form For Business |
| Form Length | 1 pages |
| Fillable? | No |
| Fillable fields | 0 |
| Avg. time to fill out | 15 sec |
| Other names | evaluation forms for presentations, business evaluation oral, evaluation, business plan evaluation form |
Business Plan Evaluation Form - Oral Presentation
Please evaluate the written business plan on the following criteria: 1=Poor, 2=Fair, |
|
|
|
|
|||
3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRESENTATION STYLE (35%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Materials presented in clear, consise, and logical and/or sequential format |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Business purpose was well explained within the first couple of minutes and left me |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
wanting for more |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
3. |
Presentation stayed within time frame |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Conveyed confidence and professionalism |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Demonstrated knowledge of industry |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
6. |
Responsiveness to judges/Effectively fielded questions |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Stimulated investor interest and/or ability to maintain judge's interest; was enthusiastic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Visual aids complemented critical plan issues and presented creatively without too many |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
words |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS PLAN SUMMARY (35%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Product/service clearly described |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Marketability of product substantiated |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3. |
Company operations clearly described |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Major risks identified |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
5. |
Sales analysis and forecasts clearly presented. Key projections clearly presented (sales, |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
profits, cash flows) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Capital requirements and source clearly stated |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Ability to relate need for the company (meaningful examples, etc) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
THE TEAM & VENTURE VIABILITY (30%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Vision: The lead entrepreneur provides clear insight into how the product/market |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
opportunity was identified and assessed |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Leadership: The lead entrepreneur demonstrates the personal characteristics necessary |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
to launch and operate this venture |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Skill: The lead entrepreneur demonstrates the skills and abilities necessary to manage |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
this venture |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Venture Fit: The team possesses the strengths needed by the venture |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Team Fit: The team demonstrates the cohesion required to perform critical venture top |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
management risks |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Viability Potential: The business, as led by this team, represents a real potential for |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
success |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|