The OHMR Form 2166, also known as the NCO Evaluation Report, serves a critical role in the career progression and development of non-commissioned officers (NCOs) within the military framework. Comprehensively structured, this document is meticulously designed to assess various dimensions of an NCO's performance and potential. Part I of the form collects essential administrative data, including personal and unit identification details, while outlining the reason for submission and the period under review. Part II delves deeper, evaluating the NCO's adherence to core values and responsibilities, competence, leadership, physical fitness, and overall contributions to their unit's mission. Each section demands specific examples of excellence, success, or areas needing improvement, allowing for a nuanced overview of the NCO's capabilities and areas for development. Authentication by the rater, senior rater, and a reviewer ensures the evaluation's accuracy and fairness, underscoring the form's significance in shaping the trajectory of an NCO's career through promotions and appointments to positions of greater responsibility. Thus, the OHMR 2166 form embodies a systematic approach to maintaining the highest standards of professionalism and efficacy among the ranks of non-commissioned officers.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Ohmr Form 2166 |
Form Length | 2 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 30 sec |
Other names | ohmr2166 blank nco reports form |
|
NCO EVALUATION REPORT: PART I |
|
|
|
SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART A - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NAME (Last, First, MI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN |
|
RANK |
|
DOR |
|
|
PMOSC |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
UNIT, STATION, ZIP CODE, MAJOR COMMAND: |
|
|
|
|
|
REASON FOR SUBMISSION |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
RATING PERIOD COVERED |
RATED |
|
|
NO. OF |
RATED NCO COPY (Check & Date) |
PSC |
CMD |
PSC |
|||||||||||||||
FROM |
|
THRU |
|
MONTHS |
|
CODES |
|
ENCL. |
|
|
|
DATE |
INITIAL |
CODE |
CODE |
||||||||
YY |
MM |
|
YY |
MM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. GIVEN TO NCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. FORWARDED TO NCO |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART B - AUTHENTICATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
NAME OF RATER (Last, First, MI) |
|
|
|
|
|
SSN |
|
SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RANK, PMOSC, / BRANCH, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, MI) |
|
|
|
|
|
SSN |
|
SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RANK, PMOSC, BRANCH, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or |
SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
DATE |
|||||||||||||||||
disagreement with the evaluation of the RATER and senior RATER. Part A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
height / weight and APFT entries are verified. I have seen this report completed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
though Part E. I am aware of the appeals process (AR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
NAME OF REVIEWER (Last, First, MI) |
|
|
|
|
|
SSN |
|
SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RANK, PMOSC, BRANCH, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
REVIEWER: |
|
|
CONCURS WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS |
|
|
DOES NOT CONCUR WITH RATER &/OR SENIOR RATER (SEE COMMENTS) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART C - DUTY DESCRIPTION (RATER) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DUTY MOSC: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
APPOINTED DUTIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
COUNSELING DATES FROM CHECKLIST/RECORDS: |
|
|
INITIAL: |
|
|
LATER: |
LATER: |
|
|
LATER: |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART D - VALUES / NCO RESPONSIBILITIES (RATER) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
COMPLETE EACH QUESTION (COMMENTS ARE MANDATORY FOR "NO" ENTRIES, OPTIONAL FOR "YES" ENTRIES |
|
|
|
YES |
NO |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Places dedication and commitment to the goals & missions of the Corps and Nation above personal goals |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
V |
|
|
PERSONAL |
2. Is committed to and shows a sense of pride in the unit - works as a member of the team. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Commitment |
3. Is disciplined and obedient to the spirit and letter of a lawful order. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
A |
|
Competence |
4. Is honest and truthful in word and deed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Candor |
5. Maintains high standards of personal conduct on and off duty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
L |
|
Courage |
6. Has the courage of convictions and the ability to overcome fear - stands up for and does what's right. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
OHMR ETHIC |
|
7. Supports EO/EEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
U |
|
BULLET COMMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Loyalty |
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Selfless Service |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Integrity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OHMR FORM 2166 (May 93)
NCO EVALUATION REPORT: PART II
RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, MI)
SSN
GRADE
THRU DATE
UNIT / ORGANIZATION |
DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
BRANCH |
|
|
|
PART D (CONT.) - VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES (RATER) |
Specific Bullet examples of "EXCELLENCE" or "NEEDS IMPROVEMENT" required. |
|
|
Specific Bullet examples of "SUCCESS" are optional. |
COMPETENCE:
*Duty proficiency; MOS competency
*Technical & tactical; knowledge, skill and abilities
*Sound judgment
*Seeking
*Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity; committed to excellence.
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
|
|
|||||||||
(Exceeds Std) |
(Meets Std.) |
|
(Some) (Much) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||||||||||
PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING |
APFT |
HEIGHT/WEIGHT |
*Mental and physical toughness
*Endurance and stamina to go the distance
*Displaying confidence and enthusiasm; looks like a soldier
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds Std) |
(Meets Std.) |
(Some) |
(Much) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEADERSHIP
*Mission first
*Genuine concern for soldiers
*Distilling the spirit to achieve and win
*Setting the example: Be Know, Do
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds Std) |
(Meets Std.) |
(Some) |
(Much) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRAINING
*Individual and team
*Mission focused; performance oriented
*Teaching soldiers how; common tasks, duty - related skills
*Sharing knowledge and experience to fight, survive and win.
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Exceeds Std) |
(Meets Std.) |
(Some) |
(Much) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
*Care and maintenance of equip./facilities
*Soldier and equipment safety
*Conservation of supplies and funds
*Encouraging soldiers to learn and grow
*Responsible for good, bad, right, & wrong
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
||||||||||
(Exceeds Std) |
(Meets Std.) |
|
(Some) |
(Much) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART E - OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL |
|||||
RATER: overall potential for promotion and or |
|
SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS: |
|||||||||
service in positions of greater responsibility. |
|
|
|||||||||
AMONG THE |
FULLY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BEST |
CAPABLE |
|
|
MARGINAL |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATER: List 3 positions in which the NCO could best serve the Corps at his/her current or next higher grade.
SENIOR RATER: |
|
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
SENIOR RATER: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
Rate Overall Performance |
|
SUCCESSFUL |
|
|
FAIR |
POOR |
|
Rate Overall Potential forSUCCESSFUL |
|
FAIR |
POOR |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
greater responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OHMR FORM 2166, PART II (May 93) |
Electronic Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|