In the realm of federal employment, particularly within nonappropriated fund instrumentalities (NAFIs), maintaining a structured and transparent performance evaluation process is crucial. The DA Form 3612 serves as a key tool in this process, offering a standardized way to document and communicate employee performance ratings. Crafted under the guidance of AR 215-3, with the Department of the Army's Deputy Chief of Staff, G1, as the proponent agency, this form encapsulates various critical data points. It captures basic information such as the employee's name, position title, and grade, alongside the name and location of the employing office. Furthermore, the form categorizes the type of rating being conducted—annual, interim, or probationary—and specifies the relevant rating period. One of its pivotal sections allows for the recommendation regarding the retention of an employee after their probationary period, underscoring its importance in workforce planning and management. The DA Form 3612 differentiates between five levels of performance—from outstanding to unsatisfactory—allowing supervisors to precisely evaluate employee contributions. Additionally, it encompasses spaces for signatures from both the supervisor and an approving official, as well as the employee, ensuring all parties are engaged in the performance discussion. This process, while it doesn't equate the employee's signature with agreement to the rating, does acknowledge their understanding of the discussion and the accuracy of the role's description as per their understanding. Engaging with DA Form 3612 is integral for both employees and supervisors within NAFIs to ensure performance reviews are conducted fairly and systematically.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Form Name | Form 3612 |
Form Length | 1 pages |
Fillable? | No |
Fillable fields | 0 |
Avg. time to fill out | 15 sec |
Other names | da form 3612 fillable, da3612, da 3612, da form 3612 fillable pdf |
NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITY
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING
For use of this form, see AR
1. NAME (Last, First, MI)
2a. POSITION TITLE |
|
|
|
2b. POSITION NUMBER |
|
|
2c. GRADE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
3. NAME AND LOCATION OF EMPLOYING OFFICE |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. TYPE OF RATING |
|
|
5. RATING PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ANNUAL |
INTERIM |
PROBATIONARY |
FROM (YYYYMMDD) |
|
TO (YYYYMMDD) |
||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
6. RETENTION AFTER PROBATIONARY PERIOD |
|
|
|
||||
RECOMMENDED |
NOT RECOMMENDED |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. THE OFFICIAL RATING ASSIGNED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING (4) |
SATISFACTORY (2) |
UNSATISFACTORY |
|||||
EXCELLENT (3) |
|
MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY (1) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
8a. SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
8b. DATE (YYYYMMDD) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
9a. APPROVING OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
9b. DATE (YYYYMMDD) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
10a. EMPLOYEE'S SIGNATURE |
|
|
|
|
10b. DATE (YYYYMMDD) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Employee's signature does not necessarily constitute agreement with the rating, but does acknowledge that position description is accurate and discussion has been held concerning performance with the rating period.)
DA FORM 3612, AUG 2019 |
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. |
APD LC v1.00ES |
|
|