Form Ppq 0 – Fill Out and Use This PDF

W912EQ-15-T-0015

SANDBLASTING AND PAINTING-MOTOR VESSEL MR. PAT

NAVFAC / USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Form PPQ -0 (9/30/11)

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when

exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

the Contractor successfully performed

The contractual performance of the element or

multiple significant events that were of

sub-element being assessed was accomplished

benefit to the Government/Owner. A

with few minor problems for which corrective

singular benefit, however, could be of such

actions taken by the contractor was highly

magnitude that it alone constitutes an

effective.

Exceptional rating. Also, there should have

been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the

exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s

Contractor successfully performed a

benefit. The contractual performance of the

significant event that was a benefit to the

element or sub-element being assessed was

Government/Owner. There should have

accomplished with some minor problems for which

been no significant weaknesses identified.

corrective actions taken by the contractor were

effective.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when

requirements. The contractual performance of the

there were only minor problems, or major

element or sub-element contains some minor

problems that the contractor recovered

problems for which corrective actions taken by the

from without impact to the contract. There

contractor appear or were satisfactory.

should have been NO significant

weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a

fundamental principle of assigning ratings is

that contractors will not be assessed a

rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not

performing beyond the requirements of the

contract.

(M) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual

A Marginal is appropriate when a

requirements. The contractual performance of the

significant event occurred that the

element or sub-element being assessed reflects a

contractor had trouble overcoming which

serious problem for which the contractor has not

impacted the Government/Owner.

yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's

proposed actions appear only marginally effective

or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate

requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely

when multiple significant events occurred

manner. The contractual performance of the

that the contractor had trouble overcoming

element or sub-element contains serious

and which impacted the

problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective

Government/Owner. A singular problem,

actions appear or were ineffective.

however, could be of such serious

magnitude that it alone constitutes an

unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Ra Rating will be neither positive nor

negative.

W912EQ-15-T-0015

SANDBLASTING AND PAINTING-MOTOR VESSEL MR. PAT

NAVFAC / USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Form PPQ -0 (9/30/11)

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E

VG

S

M

U

N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive

E

VG

S

M

U

N

customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to

contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on

E

VG

S

M

U

N

performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any

significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or

E

VG

S

M

U

N

the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks

E

VG

S

M

U

N

identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

E

VG

S

M

U

N

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and

E

VG

S

M

U

N

concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction

E

VG

S

M

U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of

E

VG

S

M

U

N

subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E

VG

S

M

U

N

c) Government Property Control

E

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E

VG

S

M

U

N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns

E

VG

S

M

U

N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E

VG

S

M

U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or

E

VG

S

M

U

N

priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead,

E

VG

S

M

U

N

manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed

E

VG

S

M

U

N

price(s)?

Page # of #

W912EQ-15-T-0015

SANDBLASTING AND PAINTING-MOTOR VESSEL MR. PAT

NAVFAC / USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Form PPQ -0 (9/30/11)

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that

reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the

E

VG

S

M

U

N

client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s

timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate

back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports,

E

VG

S

M

U

N

compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or

unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and

Yes

No

tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially

or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending

Yes

No

terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any

default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial

Yes

No

problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of

safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

E

VG

S

M

U

N

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding

housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and

E

VG

S

M

U

N

personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

(including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner

E

VG

S

M

U

N

regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this

E

VG

S

M

U

N

contractor.